# Control Systems: part 1

**URL:** <http://discourse.iapct.org/t/control-systems-part-1/2899>\
**Category:** CSG2009\
**Created:** [December 27, 2009, 9:48pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/control-systems-part-1/2899 "2009-12-27T21:48:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BUSINESS\_GAVIN\_HERMA](http://discourse.iapct.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/2acd7d/32.png) [@BUSINESS\_GAVIN\_HERMA](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/BUSINESS_GAVIN_HERMA)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2009, 9:48pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/control-systems-part-1/2899/1 "2009-12-27T21:48:57Z")

</div>

(Gavin Ritz 2008. 12.28.10.33NZT)

What I forgot to elucidate  
in the first thread was that I’m referring to the reference signals right  
at the source. That is right at the top level of PCT that is the origin of the reference  
signals and its significance.

Further the effects of  
this deprivation signal on all levels of PCT. (that’s another story)

My propositions go much further  
than just the reference signals but more of the “battery” that  
drives the control system later.

Best

Gavin

An after thought. In no  
way I’m I saying that PCT needs to change one dam thing.