CSGnet mail archive

Dag,

You mentioned some time ago that you were putting the CSGnet archives onto pctresources.com. Is that imminent? I'd like to do some statistics on the year-by-year trends of participation, as well as having a record of the actual discussions.

If bringing up your site is not imminent, would it be an awful lot of trouble for you to send me the pre-2000 ones (I have 1997, but I seem to have lost the others). If they are too big for e-mail, you could upload them to my ftp site:

···

------------------------
ftp://ftp.mmtaylor.net
login: mmt_ftp
Password: Anonymous

Change directory to "incoming".
------------------------
Thanks for any help you can offer. If it's a pain to do this, I can wait for your site to come up.

Martin

[Martin Taylor 2009.04.06]

Sorry, this wasn't supposed to go to the list. It was intended just for Dag.

Martin

···

Dag,

You mentioned some time ago that you were putting the CSGnet archives onto pctresources.com. Is that imminent? I'd like to do some statistics on the year-by-year trends of participation, as well as having a record of the actual discussions.

If bringing up your site is not imminent, would it be an awful lot of trouble for you to send me the pre-2000 ones (I have 1997, but I seem to have lost the others). If they are too big for e-mail, you could upload them to my ftp site:
------------------------
ftp://ftp.mmtaylor.net
login: mmt_ftp
Password: Anonymous

Change directory to "incoming".
------------------------
Thanks for any help you can offer. If it's a pain to do this, I can wait for your site to come up.

Martin

[From Dag Forssell (20090407 09:30 PST)]

Martin, (and other serious PCTers, past, present, and
future)

CSGnet is a unique resource. I am sure it will be studied with care by
future PCTers. There is a huge volume of discussion on many different
topics here, and many, many fine essays by Bill Powers summing up the
sometimes acrimonious discussions.

It took me a day of fiddling, but now about 900 MB of files are available
for your perusal at

ftp.pctresources.com user name: pctstudent password
re5earch!

(This opens the folder csgnet_archives with several subfolders. The
password must contain at least six characters including numbers and
punctuation marks.)

My long-time favorite file management program PowerDesk 7 got hung up
repeatedly during FTP uploads. I found FileZilla FTP Client, an open
source program, and find it much better. I will use it from now
on.

You do not have to download 900 MB. You can pick and choose which files
to download. For Eudora, you download mailboxes, then place them on your
hard disk right alongside the mailboxes (In, Out, Trash and such) that
Eudora creates when you install it. Next time you open Eudora, there they
are. You do not need tables of content, .toc files. Eudora will create
new ones from the mailbox .mbx files. .mbx files are the same for Windows
and Mac.

CSGnet_Word_digests_1990_2002_159MB
This is my original archive, consisting of Word files aggregated and
formatted to look pretty, by the month. For the early years, this is the
only record available unless Gary Cziko still has his optical disk with
an archive and we can read it. Gary and I gave up several years ago. For
the later years, zipped collections of digests are included.CSGnet_Kennaway_1994_2001_120MB
This is a backup. Kennaway collected logs from the server and shared
with me. If there is a question about the Word files, a researcher can
double-check here to see if Dag made a mistake when formatting the word
files.Eudora_mailboxes_1997_2009_382MB
I have long had my subscription to CSGnet set to digests (Dag
Forssell team@forsselltrans.com), but wised up a few years ago
and subscribed (duplicate) with individual posts as well (Dag Forssell
csgarchive@pctresources.com). Bruce Nevin shared his archive of
individual posts back to 1997. I have sorted through Bruce’s archive to
remove all personal posts. I think this archive of individual posts is
complete, but cannot be 100% sure.

A big advantage of this archive is that Eudora allows rather
sophisticated search of the individual posts. It can still be neigh
impossible to find a particular exchange you sort of remember, because
even though you can search for words and phrases using Eudora, the words
must be the ones used in the post, not the version you remember.
A duplicate is included in this archive in the digests folder. These
are digests from my original subscription to CSGnet, continuing where the
Word files end. Note that when searching in Eudora, you specify which
folders or mailboxes to include. You may limit your search to a
particular folder or time frame.Eudora_attachments_1999_2009_109MB
These are attachments to the individual posts, from Bruce Nevin’s
archive and mine.
In the word files, and in digests, you will find UUencoded
attachments. These can be extracted by creating a single file from the
rather obvious block of uniform gibberish and running a UUdecode program.
At one time I used Aladdin / Stuffit Expander. Here you could drag a
UUencoded file to the Stuffit window and presto, it was converted back to
the original attachment, file name and all.Eudora_program_PC_7.1_17MB
This is the Eudora program for Windows; the last issue available when
Eudora was placed in the public domain. Later, Open Source versions are
becoming available. See

http://www.eudora.com/
Eudora_program_MAC_6.2.4_12MB

Closed_Loop_19MB
Thrown in for good measure, here are Closed Loops in two versions for
display as single pages or spreads - your choice. (I learned last year
that vision impaired people have trouble with side-by-side columns.
Therefore the single page version. It may also be easier to read
on-screen.)Best, Dag

···

At 09:52 PM 4/5/2009, you wrote:

Dag,

You mentioned some time ago that you were putting the CSGnet archives
onto pctresources.com. Is that imminent? I’d like to do some
statistics on the year-by-year trends of participation, as well as having
a record of the actual discussions.

If bringing up your site is not imminent, would it be an awful lot of
trouble for you to send me the pre-2000 ones (I have 1997, but I seem to
have lost the others). If they are too big for e-mail, you could upload
them to my ftp site:


ftp://ftp.mmtaylor.net

login: mmt_ftp

Password: Anonymous

Change directory to “incoming”.


Thanks for any help you can offer. If it’s a pain to do this, I can
wait for your site to come up.

Martin

[From Dag Forssell (2009 15:25 PST)

Martin,

When you get around to downloading CSGnet the way I told you yesterday morning, let me know if what I uploaded, and the way it is uploaded, gave you what you wanted.

Best, Dag

···

At 09:52 PM 4/5/2009, you wrote:

Dag,

You mentioned some time ago that you were putting the CSGnet archives onto pctresources.com. Is that imminent? I’d like to do some statistics on the year-by-year trends of participation, as well as having a record of the actual discussions.

If bringing up your site is not imminent, would it be an awful lot of trouble for you to send me the pre-2000 ones (I have 1997, but I seem to have lost the others). If they are too big for e-mail, you could upload them to my ftp site:


ftp://ftp.mmtaylor.net

login: mmt_ftp

Password: Anonymous

Change directory to “incoming”.


Thanks for any help you can offer. If it’s a pain to do this, I can wait for your site to come up.

Martin

[From Bill Powers (2009.04.08.1607 MDT)]

Dag Forssell (20090407 09:30 PST)]

It took me a day of fiddling, but now about 900 MB of files are available for your perusal at

ftp.pctresources.com user name: pctstudent password re5earch!

Holy smokes! It all worked and I have the mailboxes and have been scanning some of them. At the moment I'm working on how to create a mailbox as a folder and then put all those new mailboxes in it -- I already have about 200 mailboxes.

This is going to be most interesting if I live long enough to look at everything. I happened to land on a series of exchanges between Bill Williams and several others including me. I'm surprised we didn't realize that something was seriously wrong there, and was getting worse. Though I have no idea what we could have done ...

Fortunately I now have half a terabyte of disk space on my laptop, so I can download most of the stuff. You are da man.

Best,

Bill P.

[From Dag Forssell (2009 15:25 PST)

Martin,

When you get around to downloading CSGnet the way I told you yesterday morning, let me know if what I uploaded, and the way it is uploaded, gave you what you wanted.

Best, Dag

···

At 09:52 PM 4/5/2009, you wrote:

Dag,

You mentioned some time ago that you were putting the CSGnet archives onto pctresources.com. Is that imminent? I'd like to do some statistics on the year-by-year trends of participation, as well as having a record of the actual discussions.

If bringing up your site is not imminent, would it be an awful lot of trouble for you to send me the pre-2000 ones (I have 1997, but I seem to have lost the others). If they are too big for e-mail, you could upload them to my ftp site:
------------------------
ftp://ftp.mmtaylor.net
login: mmt_ftp
Password: Anonymous

Change directory to "incoming".
------------------------
Thanks for any help you can offer. If it's a pain to do this, I can wait for your site to come up.

Martin

[Martin Taylor 2009.04.09.00.21]

Dag,

They are just what I wanted, but there seems to be something a little strange about the file type. I downloaded the Word package that starts in 1990. When I try to open the files in Word 2008 (Mac), it says that the file uses a type that is not permitted for opening by double-clicking or drag-and-drop, but that if I am sure it is safe, I can open it from the File menu in Word (which I can). The files I have sampled look just fine when I do that, and thank you very much. I just wonder why I get that message with what looks like a very ordinary Word .doc file.

Martin

···

[From Dag Forssell (2009 15:25 PST)

Martin,

When you get around to downloading CSGnet the way I told you yesterday morning, let me know if what I uploaded, and the way it is uploaded, gave you what you wanted.

Best, Dag

[From Dag Forssell (2009 0408 22:10 PST)

[Bill Powers (2009.04.08.1607 MDT)]

Bill,

Our posts were nearly simultaneous and crossed in the mail. Thanks for your confirmation. That was encouraging. For me, I will leave it to future students to read CSGnet straight through from the beginning.

Now, if only I can upload digests for 2001 and 2002. FTP has a problem with these files, but you are not looking at those right now, I am sure. Next, I will try to FTP from another computer. My server people tell me I have no limitations to worry about.

[Martin Taylor 2009.04.09.00.21]

The Word files are Word for Windows version 2.0. Whatever changes have been made from there to Word for Mac version 2008 I cannot answer for. :slight_smile:

Thanks for the confirmation. Enjoy!

Best, Dag

[From David Goldstein (2009.04.09.09:23 EST)]

Dag,

Thanks very much for doing all this work. I was able to download the info using Core FTP Lite, which is a free program.

It worked fine.

Some of the files would open with Microsoft Word 2007. and some with Word Pad. Of course the pdf files opened with Adobe.

David

···

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dag Forssell" <csgarchive@PCTRESOURCES.COM>
To: <CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: CSGnet mail archive

[From Dag Forssell (2009 0408 22:10 PST)

[Bill Powers (2009.04.08.1607 MDT)]

Bill,

Our posts were nearly simultaneous and crossed in the mail. Thanks for your confirmation. That was encouraging. For me, I will leave it to future students to read CSGnet straight through from the beginning.

Now, if only I can upload digests for 2001 and 2002. FTP has a problem with these files, but you are not looking at those right now, I am sure. Next, I will try to FTP from another computer. My server people tell me I have no limitations to worry about.

[Martin Taylor 2009.04.09.00.21]

The Word files are Word for Windows version 2.0. Whatever changes have been made from there to Word for Mac version 2008 I cannot answer for. :slight_smile:

Thanks for the confirmation. Enjoy!

Best, Dag

[From Dag Forssell (2009 0409 15:40 PST)

[Martin Taylor 2009.04.09.00.21]

Martin,

Thinking some more about your puzzlement.

Word 2008 for Mac “says the file uses a type that is not permitted…” The key here is type, or font. I can see that. Back in the 90’s fonts were bitmapped, unless you went for very expensive Type 1 PostScript fonts. (Mac did). This old Word file specifies Courier, a bitmapped font. Now bitmap fonts are ancient history and your program no doubt substitutes a True Type or even more up-to-date font type, still a version of Courier, with mathematically defined outlines.

The Word document specifies Courier, a monospace font. Monospace, where each letter occupies the same width, is required for ASCII images to display properly.

So a font and thus document conversion is a given. I can imagine this being the reason for the requirement to open the document from the Menu.

Best, Dag

···

Dag,

They are just what I wanted, but there seems to be something a little strange about the file type. I downloaded the Word package that starts in 1990. When I try to open the files in Word 2008 (Mac), it says that the file uses a type that is not permitted for opening by double-clicking or drag-and-drop, but that if I am sure it is safe, I can open it from the File menu in Word (which I can). The files I have sampled look just fine when I do that, and thank you very much. I just wonder why I get that message with what looks like a very ordinary Word .doc file.

Resend. This has not appeared in 18 hours. Small wonder posts can cross in the mail.

[From Dag Forssell (2009 0409 15:40 PST)

[Martin Taylor 2009.04.09.00.21]

Martin,

Thinking some more about your puzzlement.

Word 2008 for Mac “says the file uses a type that is not permitted…” The key here is type, or font. I can see that. Back in the 90’s fonts were bitmapped, unless you went for very expensive Type 1 PostScript fonts. (Mac did). This old Word file specifies Courier, a bitmapped font. Now bitmap fonts are ancient history and your program no doubt substitutes a True Type or even more up-to-date font type, still a version of Courier, with mathematically defined outlines.

The Word document specifies Courier, a monospace font. Monospace, where each letter occupies the same width, is required for ASCII images to display properly.

So a font and thus document conversion is a given. I can imagine this being the reason for the requirement to open the document from the Menu.

Best, Dag

···

Dag,

They are just what I wanted, but there seems to be something a little strange about the file type. I downloaded the Word package that starts in 1990. When I try to open the files in Word 2008 (Mac), it says that the file uses a type that is not permitted for opening by double-clicking or drag-and-drop, but that if I am sure it is safe, I can open it from the File menu in Word (which I can). The files I have sampled look just fine when I do that, and thank you very much. I just wonder why I get that message with what looks like a very ordinary Word .doc file.

Resend again 2009 0412 16:55 PST

Resend. This has not appeared in 18 hours. Small wonder posts can cross in the mail.

[From Dag Forssell (2009 0409 15:40 PST)

[Martin Taylor 2009.04.09.00.21]

Martin,

Thinking some more about your puzzlement.

Word 2008 for Mac “says the file uses a type that is not permitted…” The key here is type, or font. I can see that. Back in the 90’s fonts were bitmapped, unless you went for very expensive Type 1 PostScript fonts. (Mac did). This old Word file specifies Courier, a bitmapped font. Now bitmap fonts are ancient history and your program no doubt substitutes a True Type or even more up-to-date font type, still a version of Courier, with mathematically defined outlines.

The Word document specifies Courier, a monospace font. Monospace, where each letter occupies the same width, is required for ASCII images to display properly.

So a font and thus document conversion is a given. I can imagine this being the reason for the requirement to open the document from the Menu.

Best, Dag

···

Dag,

They are just what I wanted, but there seems to be something a little strange about the file type. I downloaded the Word package that starts in 1990. When I try to open the files in Word 2008 (Mac), it says that the file uses a type that is not permitted for opening by double-clicking or drag-and-drop, but that if I am sure it is safe, I can open it from the File menu in Word (which I can). The files I have sampled look just fine when I do that, and thank you very much. I just wonder why I get that message with what looks like a very ordinary Word .doc file.