[From Chris Cherpas (980311.0949 PT)]
Bruce Abbott (980311.1055 EST)
But I do think that there is a physical reality out there...
I don't know if this helps, but my take on the PCT epistemological
perspective on what looks like a subjective/objective designation
is that, in general, what is "objective" is always from the perspective
of some higher order "subjective" perception(s). What is "foundational,"
the God's-eye view, would seem to belong to the reorganization system,
and, ultimately, random. I don't know if this way of treating knowledge
is better for science, but it seems coherent for me.
Regards,
cc