I am not familiar with the availability of such articles. However, I have done some digging for you in the archive.
You may want to start off with Powers’s views on S-R & PCT:
[From Bill Powers (930112.0900)]
Greg Williams (930112) --
... where does a model for tracking which uses C,H, and T as
its variables fit? And where does a model of gravitational
attraction which uses distance and mass (observationally
proportional to weight) fit?
C, H, and T (and D) are the observable variables whose behavior
we must explain, just as position, velocity, and acceleration are
the observable variables which Newton had to explain. The
explanation goes beyond the observab…
and then do a search in the forum. Here is a search that may interest you.
Search on Behaviorism versus PCT
As far as I know, control theory is rarely discuss in psychology. If you are interested in how PCT is applied in clinical setting, it’s worth looking into @wmansell and Tim Carey’s works on Methods of Level or biopsychosocial model based of PCT