[Jim Dundon 2006.04.12.12:33EDST]
In living control systems, on page 2, Bill Powers says:
“a percept is the basic unit of experience.”.
Does PCT see the production of words as acts?
Does PCT see the naming of percepts as acts?
Does PCT see the naming of units of experiences as acts?
Does PCT see “experiencing namings” as acts?
Does PCT see the use of symbols in communication as naming acts?
In what I call the Cisena worldview all symbols of communication are products of naming acts of humans.
This includes even the spaces between words and sentences as named perceptions, basic units of experiencings because, they dictate to the reader a certain perception to experience.
If the answer to any of the above is yes, at what level is this likely to take place?
best
Jim D