from isaac n. kurtzer(921910)
i think that above symbol is correct for dating mail? i'll check back at the
the room.
···
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to w.t. powers & g. williams: about your arguments about control of others-
i have enjoyed the discussions, but understand control as tight which
eliminates the idea of control of others;unless sloppy and at-a-distance
"control"
counts as CONTROL (sorry if its awkward). also i think a FUNDAMENTAL issue
is that for Dr. Nil-point to "control" a obviously stupid rat (sarcasm) he
can'tkill it, build a house, or ride a bicycle; he IS ALSO RESTRAINED; bourbon
wrote
a paper on this and i feel that is very much ignored by people that pride
themselves on being controllers. what i see from them is their wasting their
time (possibly dedicating their lives or sacrificing their culture--in fact,
that is mandatory) to set up the conditions necessary for the "controlled"
to produce actions it doesn't care about anyway. what a waste and delusion.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
to anyone (esp. bourbon): for my last tech.writing assignment i was required to
write an expanded definition on a mechanism/device, so i did mine on the
unsung regulatory device-the toilet,yes the toilet. porcelin homeostasis!!!
i have to amuse myself somehow; oh yeah, dr. bourbon, i have talked to
gaylord and if the undergraduate perception class doesn't open and since i
refuse to take either cognitive or animal learning, and my extremely FAT A
in his class doesn't hurt, i may be able to take grad. perception as a
undergraduate!!see you at michelle's proposal.
i.n.kurtzer