# Hal--let me try being constructive

**URL:** <http://discourse.iapct.org/t/hal-let-me-try-being-constructive/5081>\
**Category:** CSG1993\
**Created:** [October 21, 1993, 3:30pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/hal-let-me-try-being-constructive/5081 "1993-10-21T15:30:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PEPINSKY\_Hal\_Crimina](http://discourse.iapct.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/c4cdca/32.png) [@PEPINSKY\_Hal\_Crimina](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/PEPINSKY_Hal_Crimina)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 1993, 3:30pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/hal-let-me-try-being-constructive/5081/1 "1993-10-21T15:30:16Z")

</div>

How would I introduce my model into McPhail et al.'s? I don't have  
the computer skills, but I'll predict theoretically a simulation  
result.

Allow your pursuit space to be three-dimensional, with sixty-degree  
vortices. Or more simply, it should work in two dimensions, even at  
ninety degree vortices. Model as a stochastic probability function  
an option to the pursuit you modeled from t-1 to t-2. The option at  
the probability you set is to move as in the leg I depict in the open  
triangle (which can graphically be transformed into two dimensions).  
Map points at successive t's as you do now. At some critical point in  
your probability variable, some critical, catalyzing setting, which I  
expect to be below 50%, the points should crystallize as though  
strangely attracted into an infinite regress of tetrahedrons, a  
fractal diagram composed of tetrahedrons. I call this process, among  
other things, democratization of control. If it works as I theorize,  
we should be able to translate the model into practice, noticing  
positive effects of moving tetrahedronally in response to conflict.

now what?...l&p hal