# No revelations for L & L

**URL:** <http://discourse.iapct.org/t/no-revelations-for-l-l/7710>\
**Category:** CSG1993\
**Created:** [May 26, 1993, 12:15am UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/no-revelations-for-l-l/7710 "1993-05-26T00:15:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hortideas\_Publishin1](http://discourse.iapct.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/f6c823/32.png) [@Hortideas\_Publishin1](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/Hortideas_Publishin1)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 1993, 12:15am UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/no-revelations-for-l-l/7710/1 "1993-05-26T00:15:00Z")

</div>

> From Greg Williams (930525 - 4)

> Tom Bourbon (930525.1723)

> (Notice that L and L did not mention PCT. Leave them to their bliss!)

I think Locke and Latham would have had to foretell the future to  
mention PCT, even though they reference Bill Powers' 1973 SCIENCE  
papersince their book was published in 1990 and Kent suggested (as I  
recall) adding the "P" no earlier than 1991. Gary Cziko -- I guess  
(if I'm right about the date) this means L & L probably aren't pushing  
a SUPERNATURAL psychology.

As ever,

Greg

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_BOURBON3](http://discourse.iapct.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/85e7bf/32.png) [@Tom\_BOURBON3](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/Tom_BOURBON3)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 1993, 2:01pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/no-revelations-for-l-l/7710/2 "1993-05-26T14:01:40Z")

</div>

> From Tom Bourbon (930526.0758)

> > From Greg Williams (930525 - 4)
> 
> > Tom Bourbon (930525.1723)
> 
> > (Notice that L and L did not mention PCT. Leave them to their bliss!)
> 
> I think Locke and Latham would have had to foretell the future to  
> mention PCT, even though they reference Bill Powers' 1973 SCIENCE  
> papersince their book was published in 1990 and Kent suggested (as I  
> recall) adding the "P" no earlier than 1991. Gary Cziko -- I guess  
> (if I'm right about the date) this means L & L probably aren't pushing  
> a SUPERNATURAL psychology.

Shortly after sending my post, I discovered the date of their book. That  
little detail doesn't change my suggetsion -- they were as wrong then as  
they are now -- leave them to their bliss.

Until later,  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Tom Bourbon