i.kurtzer
the learning stuff is very tricky for my small brain, so it seems to be wise
to proceed very slowly. and it is not in the least helped by the sheer
looseness of all learning theories that i'm aware of, including PCT.
i think that just redoing the "flip" experiement would be nice and recording
the components orthogonal to the feedback function--that is recording the
left-right movements of the manipulandum, even though those movements do not
affect the cusor target relation. see how prevalent it is, and maybe chart
ratio changes to see if the references are whittled down, continue changing in
the same direction, or retain those "irrevelant" components.
i.
Hi, Isaac--
the learning stuff is very tricky for my small brain, so it seems to be wise
to proceed very slowly. and it is not in the least helped by the sheer
looseness of all learning theories that i'm aware of, including PCT.
i think that just redoing the "flip" experiement would be nice and recording
the components orthogonal to the feedback function--that is recording the
left-right movements of the manipulandum, even though those movements do not
affect the cusor target relation. see how prevalent it is, and maybe chart
ratio changes to see if the references are whittled down, continue
changing >in the same direction, or retain those "irrevelant" components.
You're going to have to be much clearer about what you mean before my old
brain can comprehend it. How about laying down in print exactly what it is
you proposed to do? All I have now are memories of phone conversations, not
all of which were totally coherent.
Bill