# Problems posting

**URL:** <http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134>\
**Category:** CSG2017\
**Created:** [November 14, 2017, 3:45pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134 "2017-11-14T15:45:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kennaway\_Richard\_Dr](http://discourse.iapct.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/45deac/32.png) [@Kennaway\_Richard\_Dr](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/Kennaway_Richard_Dr)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2017, 3:45pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134/1 "2017-11-14T15:45:40Z")

</div>

When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing)]

No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?

I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:

> **···**
>
> ----  
> [Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
> 
> [From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]  
> RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the  
> ----
> 
> Did anyone else receive it?
> 
> --  
> Richard Kennaway  
> School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK  
> Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Abbott](http://discourse.iapct.org/user_avatar/discourse.iapct.org/abbott/32/2879_2.png) [@Abbott](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/Abbott)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2017, 4:04pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134/2 "2017-11-14T16:04:32Z")

</div>

I did receive that post and am not receiving the spoofing warning.

Bruce

> **···**
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Nov 14, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) \<R.Kennaway@uea.ac.uk\> wrote:
> > 
> > When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
> > 
> > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing\](http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing%5C)]
> > 
> > No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
> > 
> > I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
> > 
> > ----  
> > [Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
> > 
> > [From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]  
> > RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the  
> > ----
> > 
> > Did anyone else receive it?
> > 
> > --  
> > Richard Kennaway  
> > School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK  
> > Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rupert](http://discourse.iapct.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/f14d63/32.png) [@rupert](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/rupert)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2017, 4:12pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134/3 "2017-11-14T16:12:17Z")

</div>

I’ve received both of your messages (and this third). Neither was  
headed as below.

```
  Also when I send a message to csgnet I don't get a copy or

```

confirmation message back. Are you subscribed with two different  
email addresses?

> **···**
>
> **Regards,  
> Rupert**
> 
> ```
> On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) wrote:
> 
> ```
> 
> > ```auto
> > 
> > When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
> > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at]
> > No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
> > I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
> > ----
> > [Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
> > [From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
> > RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the ----
> > Did anyone else receive it?
> > --
> > Richard Kennaway
> > School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
> > Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
> > 
> > ```
> 
> [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__aka.ms_LearnAboutSpoofing&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=AeB2gF2KraqXCvqlID1T-SccXWy4PgMLLMHmGZV4Gjo&s=wwaL_3zoowDkaV5y_OFDaGfd5TyeEgAkmn9fBkGrXDk&e=)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MartinT](http://discourse.iapct.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/ee7513/32.png) [@MartinT](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/MartinT)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2017, 4:55pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134/4 "2017-11-14T16:55:57Z")

</div>

Richard,

```
  When I had similar problems (actually being blocked rather than

```

being warned), the answer was for Rick to get the guru to  
whitelist my mailing address. Your symptom is different, but it  
might have the same solution.

Martin

> **···**
>
> On 2017/11/14 11:12 AM, Rupert Young  
> wrote:
> 
> > ```
> > I've received both of your messages (and this third). Neither
> > 
> > ```
> > 
> > was headed as below.
> 
> > ```
> > Also when I send a message to csgnet I don't get a copy or
> > 
> > ```
> > 
> > confirmation message back. Are you subscribed with two different  
> > email addresses?
> 
> **Regards,  
> Rupert**
> 
> ```
> On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) wrote:
> 
> ```
> 
> > ```auto
> > 
> > When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
> > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at]
> > No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
> > I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
> > ----
> > [Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
> > [From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
> > RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the ----
> > Did anyone else receive it?
> > --
> > Richard Kennaway
> > School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
> > Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
> > 
> > ```
> 
> [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__aka.ms_LearnAboutSpoofing&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=AeB2gF2KraqXCvqlID1T-SccXWy4PgMLLMHmGZV4Gjo&s=wwaL_3zoowDkaV5y_OFDaGfd5TyeEgAkmn9fBkGrXDk&e=)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![richardhpfau](http://discourse.iapct.org/user_avatar/discourse.iapct.org/richardhpfau/32/24_2.png) [@richardhpfau](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/richardhpfau)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2017, 8:30pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134/5 "2017-11-14T20:30:45Z")

</div>

I may be facing the same problem of possibly having some messages blocked. On Friday (2017.11.11 9:25 pm EST) I sent a message to csgnet titled “ **Popularizing PCT on Facebook** ”. Was it received by any of you (or others on the csgnet)??? Please let me know if you received it or not.

Richard Pfau

> **···**
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Martin Taylor [mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net](mailto:mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net) wrote:
> 
> > Richard,
> 
> > ```
> > When I had similar problems (actually being blocked rather than
> > 
> > ```
> > 
> > being warned), the answer was for Rick to get the guru to  
> > whitelist my mailing address. Your symptom is different, but it  
> > might have the same solution.
> 
> > Martin
> 
> > 
> 
> > ```
> > On 2017/11/14 11:12 AM, Rupert Young
> > 
> > ```
> > 
> > wrote:
> 
> > > ```
> > > I've received both of your messages (and this third). Neither
> > > 
> > > ```
> > > 
> > > was headed as below.
> 
> > > ```
> > > Also when I send a message to csgnet I don't get a copy or
> > > 
> > > ```
> > > 
> > > confirmation message back. Are you subscribed with two different  
> > > email addresses?
> 
> > > **Regards,  
> > > Rupert**
> 
> > > ```
> > > On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) wrote:
> > > 
> > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
> > > > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__aka.ms_LearnAboutSpoofing&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=AeB2gF2KraqXCvqlID1T-SccXWy4PgMLLMHmGZV4Gjo&s=wwaL_3zoowDkaV5y_OFDaGfd5TyeEgAkmn9fBkGrXDk&e=)
> > > > ]
> > > > No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
> > > > I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
> > > > ----
> > > > [Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
> > > > [From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
> > > > RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the ----
> > > > Did anyone else receive it?
> > > > --
> > > > Richard Kennaway
> > > > School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
> > > > Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
> > > > 
> > > > ```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MartinT](http://discourse.iapct.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/ee7513/32.png) [@MartinT](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/MartinT)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2017, 9:08pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134/6 "2017-11-14T21:08:26Z")

</div>

Received normally.

Martin

> **···**
>
> On 2017/11/14 3:30 PM, Richard Pfau  
> wrote:
> 
> > ```
> > I may be facing the same problem of possibly having some
> > 
> > ```
> > 
> > messages blocked. On Friday (2017.11.11 9:25 pm EST) I sent  
> > a message to csgnet titled "\*\* Popularizing PCT on  
> > Facebook\*\* ". Was it received by any of you (or  
> > others on the csgnet)??? Please let me know if you received  
> > it or not.
> 
> > 
> 
> > Richard Pfau
> 
> > ```
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM,
> > 
> > ```
> > 
> > Martin Taylor [mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net](mailto:mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net)  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Richard,
> 
> > > ```
> > > When I had similar problems (actually being blocked
> > > 
> > > ```
> > > 
> > > rather than being warned), the answer was for Rick to  
> > > get the guru to whitelist my mailing address. Your  
> > > symptom is different, but it might have the same  
> > > solution.
> 
> > > Martin
> 
> > >
> 
> > > ```
> > > On
> > > 
> > > ```
> > > 
> > > 2017/11/14 11:12 AM, Rupert Young wrote:
> 
> > > > ```
> > > > I've received both of your messages (and this
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> > > > 
> > > > third). Neither was headed as below.
> 
> > > > ```
> > > > Also when I send a message to csgnet I don't get
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> > > > 
> > > > a copy or confirmation message back. Are you  
> > > > subscribed with two different email addresses?
> 
> > > > **Regards,  
> > > > Rupert**
> 
> > > > ```
> > > > On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP -
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> > > > 
> > > > Visitor) wrote:
> 
> > > > > ```auto
> > > > > 
> > > > > When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
> > > > > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__aka.ms_LearnAboutSpoofing&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=AeB2gF2KraqXCvqlID1T-SccXWy4PgMLLMHmGZV4Gjo&s=wwaL_3zoowDkaV5y_OFDaGfd5TyeEgAkmn9fBkGrXDk&e=)
> > > > > ]
> > > > > No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
> > > > > I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
> > > > > ----
> > > > > [Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
> > > > > [From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
> > > > > RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the ----
> > > > > Did anyone else receive it?
> > > > > --
> > > > > Richard Kennaway
> > > > > School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
> > > > > Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
> > > > > 
> > > > > ```
> 
> >

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FredNickols](http://discourse.iapct.org/user_avatar/discourse.iapct.org/frednickols/32/2645_2.png) [@FredNickols](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/FredNickols)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2017, 9:10pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/problems-posting/9134/7 "2017-11-14T21:10:34Z")

</div>

[From Fred Nickols (2017.11.14.1607 ET)]

For what it’s worth I received it – and, obviously, this one. However, I received the popularizing email on Saturday, not Friday.

Fred Nickols

> **···**
>
> **From:** Richard Pfau [[mailto:richardhpfau@gmail.com](mailto:richardhpfau@gmail.com)]  
> **Sent:** Tuesday, November 14, 2017 3:31 PM  
> **To:** csgnet@lists.illinois.edu  
> **Subject:** Re: Problems posting
> 
> I may be facing the same problem of possibly having some messages blocked. On Friday (2017.11.11 9:25 pm EST) I sent a message to csgnet titled “ **Popularizing PCT on Facebook** ”. Was it received by any of you (or others on the csgnet)??? Please let me know if you received it or not.
> 
> Richard Pfau
> 
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Martin Taylor [mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net](mailto:mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net) wrote:
> 
> > Richard,
> 
> > When I had similar problems (actually being blocked rather than being warned), the answer was for Rick to get the guru to whitelist my mailing address. Your symptom is different, but it might have the same solution.
> 
> > Martin
> 
> > On 2017/11/14 11:12 AM, Rupert Young wrote:
> 
> > > I’ve received both of your messages (and this third). Neither was headed as below.
> 
> > > Also when I send a message to csgnet I don’t get a copy or confirmation message back. Are you subscribed with two different email addresses?
> 
> > > **Regards,  
> > > Rupert**
> 
> > > On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) wrote:
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__aka.ms_LearnAboutSpoofing&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=AeB2gF2KraqXCvqlID1T-SccXWy4PgMLLMHmGZV4Gjo&s=wwaL_3zoowDkaV5y_OFDaGfd5TyeEgAkmn9fBkGrXDk&e=)]
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > ----
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > [Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > [From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > ----
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > Did anyone else receive it?
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > --
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > Richard Kennaway
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
> > > > 
> > > > ```
> 
> > > > ```auto
> > > > 
> > > > ```