hello ladies and e. coli, this is the family man. i had a wonderful time
meeting you guys in person and would like to give a special hello to the
PLAYER. i have just started on a research project for my tech writing class
and i have decided to analyze post-slave revolt Sparta in view of PCT. i
think its a wonderful example on how on a macrolevel to contol x is to oblige
oneself to restrictions. ex., if i decide to keep my car on the road i am
obligated to act against disturbances that would change the relationship ipso
facto limiting my action-parameters(possibly poor word choice)meaning i can't
sleep, play baseball or build a house. i do have to keep my eyes open looking
at the road ahead of me and use the steering wheel to counter disturbances.
now on a macrolevel, if a group is going to oppress another in order to
use them for slave labor that group of oppressers is limited in what they
can do (this is blatant when the slave population greatly
outnumbers the "master" population) [they cannot allow civil liberties to
the oppressed (freedom of movement, of congregation, of bearing arms)]
and they are obligated to do certain things - establish a powerful military,
become isolationist to "keep their eyes on the road" and numerous other
actions if the oppressed group is an extreme threat: establishment of
military state with rigid hierarchy, disinterest in nonutilitarian endeavors
(art, music, dance), etc. i hope this does not come off with any group
mind overtones, that is the opposite of my intention. i do wish to show
that on a macrolevel,also, control necessarily limits actions and obligates
others. in fact that is the sin qua non of control.
z
hello ladies and e. coli, this is isaac the family man. i have already sent
a message but i no idea whether it sent because this machine is the nexus
of hell, AAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if the original did send then ignore this rewrite. first i'm glad i met
you guys and would like to give a big hello to THE PLAYER and a thankyou
you guys and would like to give a big hello to THE PLAYER and a thankyou
ignore those last two lines i AM going to put my foot through this piece
of *#%^@##!!!! .... and a thankyou to the PLAYER and Runkel for sending
their papers. i have just started on a reseach paper for my tech writing
class. i've decided to analyze post-slave revolt Sparta in view of PCT.
i basically going to attemt to show that control entails restriction and
obligation on a macrolevel also. to keep my car on the road i am obligated
to stay awake, keep my sight on the road ahead of me, and use the steering
wheel to act against disturbances to that relationship. i am also restricted
from sleeping , taking a shower, building a house, etc. this was shown clearly
in Bourbon's demonstration where one person could "control" another's handle
movement if 1) that person was able to maintain their desired perception
2) the "controller" obligated himself to certain actions and restricted
himself from others [obligation-move in any way in order to produce desired
action in the "controlled" person, restriction-ability to control own
cursor, close eyes, close other person eyes, leave, kill other person, etc.].
this is the same on a macrolevel;if a group is going to oppress another
(assuming that the oppressed population doesn't particularly enjoy their
lot and the oppressed population is as large or larger in numbers than
the "masters") then one will see the same restriction and obligatiom
of action-parameters. The oppressors CANNOT allow the slaves any civil
liberties(freedom of movement,congregation,speech,bear arms). The oppressors
are
obligated to become isolationistic ( to "keep their eyes on the road" ),
and establish or strengthen the military class. if the slave population is
large and volitile enough then to keep them down more drastic measures are
NECESSARY: establishment of military state and rigid hierarchy,abandonment
or lack of concern for nonutilitarian endeavors (art,music,dance), etc.
this was the case in Sparta where extreme social,political, and cultural
changes were necessary to keep the slave population checked and working.
to control them they were obligated to certain action (not in the least
keeping the slaves alive) and restricted from others. it is NOT my intent
that this has any group mind (fie!) overtones. obligation and restriction
is the sine qua non of control.