Rick's paper

I really enjoyed your paper. I agree with all of the postive
comments made by the others as well as their suggestions for when
you rewrite.

I plan to use it to educate the consulting psychologists and
psychiatrists at the place where I work about HPCT and its
relationship to other views in psychology.

From a therapy perspective, all three views would likely fall

under the cognitive/behavioral umbrella. This leaves out the
psychoanalytic and humanistic/existential perpsectives.

One observation: Most of the consultant clinical staff to our
center are psychoanalytically oriented. I think that HPCT therapy
ideas have something in common with psychoanalytic views. For
example: the idea of the importance of conflict, the idea of
background perceptions at a higher level which a person is not
aware of, the idea of resistance in therapy, the importance of
wants.

In terms of your three blind men, I guess I would have to say
that the "cognitive" view comes the closest to representing the
psychoanalytic position. Would you agree?

Another point: the humanistic/existential view, for example as
represented by Alvin Mahrer, is another major frame of reference
in therapy which seems to be missing from the story. Can they be
included?

I would appreciate receiving an updated version of the paper when
it becomes available.

Thanks.

···

To: Rick Marken, other CSGnet people
From: David Goldstein
Subject: your paper
Date: 05/10/92

[From Marcos Rodrigues 921023.1000]

Bruce Nevin: Your message of Thu, 22 Oct 92 11:25:09 EDT:

The last sentence is unnecessarily obscure, I think. Maybe it would
help to state that the high-level "command" is nothing other than the
reference signal r identified near the outset of the paper. After all,
the term "command" is used here ironically at best, no?

Having read the extract you posted, I also think it is obscure. However,
I think that the word "command" is strictly right, since the reference
signal is a request for a perception.

Regards,

Marcos.