Roots (from Mary)

[from Mary Powers 961002]

Remi Cote:

If people don't respond to a particular post, it's usually
because they are busy doing something else, or don't feel they
have anything useful to say.

I had difficulty with your post because I think you are confused
about the definition of "paradigm". I think a more correct word
for your ideas about roots is "metaphor". You are talking about
roots and their functions as if a control system "is like" a root
system.

On this net, PCT is the paradigm. It is quite likely that roots,
the way root cells function, the overall organization of plant
life, etc., etc., are examples of the workings of control systems
(not the other way around). However, there are no plant
physiologists that I know of who are investigating botanical
control theory.

Mary P.

from remi cote 961003.1019 EST

Thank you Mary.

I think you are righ that roots post doesn't deserve
the title of paradigm...

I was just having a little malaise and I want to share it
and to call it a paradigm I thought it would grasp attention.

The malaise: My thougt and goal are just like these rampant
obsessef thing (roots) that just crave for there reference signal.

They are determined by there reference signal. No free choice there!
(condemed to be free).

Roots are controling for intensity and sensation (photocell).

We are more complex. But goal are still reference signal.
So our behavior always go in the direction that will reduce
error signal. There is absolutely no choice.

Fell free to comment this if you have time, it will help.

Mr Remi Cote