Rushton et al.

[From Bruce Gregory (990426.1412 EDT)]

Rick Marken (990426.1030)

I always read to the end before responding. This has nothing
to do with my complaint about the creepy things you said in
the _middle_ of your post. What you said in the middle of your
post was:

> I worry when you say that an entire profession of successful
> engineers do not understand control theory.

I'd worry too, if I had said such a thing. But I didn't.

Here's what you did say:

Rick Marken (990420.1300)

It is perfectly possible for people to understand control theory
(as Bruce Abbott does) and not know that a closed negative
feedback loops is organized around the control of perceptual
variables. Control theory has been applied to behavior since 1945
(at least). Many of these applications have been done by people
who had a very good understanding of the mathematics of control
theory. In none of those cases did the control theorist understand
that a control system controls a perceptual representation, not
an objective state of affairs; and s/he certainly didn't understand
what this means in terms of understanding the behavior of the living
systems to which their theory was being applied.

Perhaps you can see why I interpreted your statement the way that I did.
Then again, perhaps you can't. If I were a control engineer I _might_
take umbrage at your remarks. Perhaps your statements were directed only
at control engineers with the audacity to attempt to apply their
knowledge to understanding the behavior of living systems.

Bruce Gregory

[From Rick Marken (990426.1220)]

Me:

It is perfectly possible for people to understand control theory
(as Bruce Abbott does) and not know that a closed negative
feedback loops is organized around the control of perceptual
variables. Control theory has been applied to behavior since 1945
(at least). Many of these applications have been done by people
who had a very good understanding of the mathematics of control
theory. In none of those cases did the control theorist understand
that a control system controls a perceptual representation, not
an objective state of affairs; and s/he certainly didn't understand
what this means in terms of understanding the behavior of the
living systems to which their theory was being applied.

Bruce Gregory (990426.1412 EDT)

Perhaps you can see why I interpreted your statement the way
that I did. Then again, perhaps you can't.

You're right. I can't.

You managed to interpret what I said here to be: "the entire
profession of successful control engineers do not understand
control theory". How you get that meaning from what I said is
a mystery to me.

If I were a control engineer I _might_ take umbrage at your
remarks.

Why? If you were a control engineer who knew that control
systems control their perceptions I imagine you would be
quite pleased with my remarks.

Perhaps your statements were directed only at control engineers
with the audacity to attempt to apply their knowledge to
understanding the behavior of living systems.

My statements were directed at _you_ because you seemed to
think that a person understands control theory simply because
s/he is classified as a control engineer. I said it to try to help
you overcome _your_ prejudice; your belief that people possess
a certain trait (understand control theory) simply because they
are a member of a certain group ("control engineers"). The point
I make in the quote above is that you should abandon that
prejudice; it's simply not true that a person can be assumed to
understand control theory just because they happen to be a
control engineer. This is proven by the fact that you can find
control engineers who don't understand control theory. That's
why I said:

In none of those cases [of control engineers applying control
theory to behavior] did the control theorist understand
that a control system controls a perceptual representation, not
an objective state of affairs

This doesn't say that all control engineers don't understand
control theory. It says that none of the control engineers who
did apply control theory to behavior (a small subset of the group
"control engineers") understood one important aspect of control
theory.

I don't know how I could have said this more clearly. Maybe
you have a suggestion. How could I have said "just because a
person is a control engineer doesn't mean that they understand
control theory" in a way that you would not interpret as "control
engineers don't understand control theory"?

Best

Rick

···

---
Richard S. Marken Phone or Fax: 310 474-0313
Life Learning Associates e-mail: rmarken@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken

[From Bruce Gregory (990426 1535 EDT)]

Rick Marken (990426.1220)

I don't know how I could have said this more clearly. Maybe
you have a suggestion. How could I have said "just because a
person is a control engineer doesn't mean that they understand
control theory" in a way that you would not interpret as "control
engineers don't understand control theory"?

It might help me if you would name a few control engineers who _do_
understand control theory (other than Bill, of course). Could you give
me any references to the literature in which a control engineer reveals
his or her understanding of control theory to your satisfaction?

Bruce Gregory

[From Rick Marken (990426.1545)]

Me:

How could I have said "just because a person is a control
engineer doesn't mean that they understand control theory"
in a way that you would not interpret as "control engineers
don't understand control theory"?

Bruce Gregory (990426 1535 EDT) --

It might help me if you would name a few control engineers who
_do_ understand control theory (other than Bill, of course).

I don't know any (other than Bill, of course) who understand
those aspects of control theory (like control of perception)
that must be understood in order to apply control theory properly
to the behavior of living systems. But that doesn't mean there
are none. It just means I haven't found any. Do you know any?

Best

Rick

···

--
Richard S. Marken Phone or Fax: 310 474-0313
Life Learning Associates e-mail: rmarken@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken

i.kurtzer (990426.2200)

Richard Marken wrote:

[From Rick Marken (990426.1545)]

Me:

> How could I have said "just because a person is a control
> engineer doesn't mean that they understand control theory"
> in a way that you would not interpret as "control engineers
> don't understand control theory"?

Bruce Gregory (990426 1535 EDT) --

> It might help me if you would name a few control engineers who
> _do_ understand control theory (other than Bill, of course).

I don't know any (other than Bill, of course) who understand
those aspects of control theory (like control of perception)
that must be understood in order to apply control theory properly
to the behavior of living systems. But that doesn't mean there
are none. It just means I haven't found any. Do you know any?

Bill Leach.

i.

[From Rick Marken (990426.2130)]

Bruce Gregory (990426 1535 EDT) --

It might help me if you would name a few control engineers who
_do_ understand control theory (other than Bill, of course).

Me:

I don't know any...

i.kurtzer (990426.2200)

Bill Leach.

Yes, I was going to mention Bill Leach. But then I thought that
Bill L. would be classified as a nuclear engineer. But I'm certainly
willing to call Bill a control engineer. So Bill Leach is one
control engineer, besides Bill P., who _defintely_ understands
control theory. I live in the sincere hope that there are some
others.

Best

Rick

···

---
Richard S. Marken Phone or Fax: 310 474-0313
Life Learning Associates e-mail: rmarken@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken/

[From Bruce Gregory (990427.0935 EDT)]

Rick Marken (990426.2130)

i.kurtzer (990426.2200)

> Bill Leach.

Yes, I was going to mention Bill Leach. But then I thought that
Bill L. would be classified as a nuclear engineer. But I'm certainly
willing to call Bill a control engineer. So Bill Leach is one
control engineer, besides Bill P., who _defintely_ understands
control theory. I live in the sincere hope that there are some
others.

Well if there is one control engineer who understands the underlying
theory (besides Bill) you cannot have been saying "an entire profession
of successful engineers do not understand control theory." I stand
corrected. Perhaps a qualification of the form "almost an entire
profession..." would better capture your intention?

Bruce Gregory

[From Rick Marken (990427.0720)]

Bruce Gregory (990427.0935 EDT)--

Well if there is one control engineer who understands the
underlying theory (besides Bill) you cannot have been saying
"an entire profession of successful engineers do not understand
control theory." I stand corrected.

You stood corrected before Bill Leach was mentioned. I could
not have been saying "an entire profession of successful
engineers do not understand control theory" because I never
said it. I explained this in my last few posts to you. Whether
or not I know a control engineer who understands that control
systems control perceptions is irrelevant to my point, which was
"just because a person is a control engineer doesn't guarantee
that s/he understands control theory".

You keep trying to accuse me of having said that "an entire
profession of successful engineers do not understand control
theory". I didn't. Now please crawl back into your cave and
stay there until you have something intelligent to contribute
to this list.

Best

Rick

···

--
Richard S. Marken Phone or Fax: 310 474-0313
Life Learning Associates e-mail: rmarken@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken

[From Bruce Gregory (990427.1032 EDT)]

Rick Marken (990427.0720)

Now please crawl back into your cave and
stay there until you have something intelligent to contribute
to this list.

I must have _really_ touched a nerve. Perhaps Isaac is right, you are
going through an unpleasant change of life. Sorry. Hope you feel better
soon.

Bruce Gregory

[From Rick Marken (990427.0750)]

Bruce Gregory (990427.1032 EDT)--

I must have _really_ touched a nerve.

Big time!

Perhaps Isaac is right, you are going through an unpleasant
change of life. Sorry. Hope you feel better soon.

Nope. Same ol' lovable, happy-go-lucky, slime ball despising me:-)

Best

Rick

···

--
Richard S. Marken Phone or Fax: 310 474-0313
Life Learning Associates e-mail: rmarken@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~rmarken

[From Bruce Gregory (990427.1104 EDT)]

Rick Marken (990427.0750)

Nope. Same ol' lovable, happy-go-lucky, slime ball despising me:-)

That's what I was afraid of.

Bruce Gregory