Remi Cote 012696.1420
OK now I will follow carafully instruction:
With a cooling rate of 0.3, a units of output per units of error
of:
0.1 asymptote to 17
0.2 asymptote to 18.50
0.3 asymptote to 19
0.5 asymptote to 19.40 after 12 iteration
0.6 asymptote to 19.50 after 9 iteration
0.7 asymptote to 19.57 after 7 iteration
0.8 asymptote to 19.63 after 5 iteration
0.9 asymptote to 19.67 after 5 iteration
0.95 asymptote to 19.68 after 3 iteration (not much an asymptote)
1 a step to 19.70 after 1 iteration
Always with a T' (reference) of 20 degree with a cooling rate of 0.9 and
a units of outputs per units of error of:
0.1 asymptote to 11
0.2 asymptote to 15.50
0.3 asymptote to 17.00
0.5 asymptote to 18.20 after 12 iteration
0.6 asymptote to 18.50 after 9 iteration
0.7 asymptote to 18.71 after 7 iteration
0.8 asymptote to 18.88 after 5 iteration
0.9 asymptote to 19.00 after 5 iteration
0.95 a step to 19.10 after 1 iteration
with a cooling of 0.3, and a u.o./u.e. of 2, after the second iteration
it goes up to 39.7, and with a downward slope to the plateau 19.80 after
67 iteration
With a cooling rate of 0.9, and a u.o./u.e. of 2, after the second iteration
it goes up to 39.1, and then downward to reach a plateau at 19.30 after
23 iteration.
I note that with either cooling rate, the number of iteration to reach
plateau is the same and is depending of u.o./u.e..
I also note that u.o./u.e. are ineficient after 1.
I could make an hypothesis saying that the best u.o./u.e. is this one or that one. So I am asking what are the criteium to choose the best u.o./u.e?
And I am asking again about the if-then. The if-then is simple it doesen't
need to consider the unit of output/unit of error. It just give one kind of
output, just like the bacteria (forgot the name) that stop forwarding when it
doesn't sense the good (inner,genetic,reference) chemical, or the moose that
respond to the fake panache when it see's one in his territory.
In the conception of a control process, I am on a crossroads. Do I conceive
homeostat with or without u.o./u.e.. My concern is nature. Witch one mother
nature chose. My first guess is:"the simple one". And the more effective
one too. But in the end I haven't made my choice yet. Maybe I don't fully
understand the u.o./u.e. But the fact remain than if - then homeostat are
more effective, more simple...and not only that.
I have a theory about reorganisation. If you conceive the brain as million
of if-then structure in hierarchical control process, and you add the principle
of natural selection from Darwin. The good if-then survive the stress, and
starvation from food, pleasure or sensation(activation), the unfit if-then
extinguish. This is not MY theory, but I think it is a good one.
I hope I will have your opinion on this post Bill...
Remi
.3 per dt, at the second iteration it goes up to 70 then there is a downward slope reaching plateau at 19.80 after 67 iteration with a cooling rate of 0.9 per dt, at the second iteration it goes up to 39.10
th23 iteration
Iaaaa
en there is a more pronounced downward slope reaching plateau at 19.30 after