Hi Tim,
[From Tim Carey (980521.0640)]
>From [Marc Abrams (980520.1136)]
Perhaps you missed my question. :-). Could you please tell me how
_your_ definition of "the environment" differs from Bills use of
"the
system". I am trying to understand _your_ concept of "the
environment".
Marc, on every PCT diagram I've seen there is a little thin line that
separates the system from the environment; that's what I'm taking as
the
environment.
Cute Tim, What exactly is _in_ _your_ "environment" that is not in
"the system" or what is not in your "environment" that is in "the
system". Are there _any_ other differences that might distinguish your
"environment" from Bills "system".
The reason I brought up the _Reality Therapy_ note yesterday was
because a number of concepts ( including the initial questions ) are
artifacts of Reality Therapy and Eds use of them as a Reality
therapist prior to the formal development and introduction of RTP.
This is completely inaccurate. Sure Ed worked with Glasser before he
learned about PCT, so what? Glasser was trained in Freudian
psychoanalysis
before he developed Reality Therapy. Psychoanalysis and Reality
Therapy
both use questions, gee Reality Therapy must be based on
Psychoanalysis.
I don't think you would get agreement from _anyone_; not Ed _nor_
Glasser
that Ed's work is based on Glasser's.
See my last post? Still so damn cocksure of yourself 
Marc