VS: Perceptual Intelligence

Is PCI too long?


Lähettäjä: Alison Powers [mailto:controlsystemsgroupconference@gmail.com]
Lähetetty: 9. kesäkuutata 2017 3:03
Vastaanottaja: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Aihe: Re: Perceptual Intelligence


Well, dang. I still think we can us it as PI vs AI. There are often different definitions for the same word. I see it as the operating software that will run perceptual robots.

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Eetu Pikkarainen eetu.pikkarainen@oulu.fi wrote:

[Eetu Pikkarainen 2017-06-08]

Yes, usually they do not take into account that our perceptions or senses are just tools which have developed by evolutionary reorganization
to help our self-preservation i.e. control of intrinsic values.

Perceptions, senses and knowledge are considered as somewhat disconnected from our living and action – and, ok, behavior.

They think we just process our perceptions like computers.


From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us]
Sent: 8. kesäkuuta 2017 14:09
To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Subject: RE: Perceptual Intelligence

[From Fred Nickols (2017.06.08.0706)]

P.S. None of that perceptual intelligence “stuff� is to my liking. It deals with the notion that all we know of the world out there is by way of our perceptions,
and that’s okay, but then it goes on to lay out how we process those perceptions and it gets a little freaky at that point.


From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 6:43 AM
To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Subject: Perceptual Intelligence

Well, I guess I won’t be exploiting the term “perceptual intelligence� after all. I Googled it and turns out there’s a ton of stuff already out there.


Fred Nickols, Managing Partner

My Objective is to Help You Achieve Yours


“Assistance at a Distance�