# What happened to mindreadings.com?
**URL:** http://discourse.iapct.org/t/what-happened-to-mindreadings-com/12293
**Category:** CSG2009
**Created:** [June 5, 2009, 7:17pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/what-happened-to-mindreadings-com/12293 "2009-06-05T19:17:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Dick\_Robertson](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/Dick_Robertson)
#### Post date: [June 5, 2009, 7:17pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/what-happened-to-mindreadings-com/12293/1 "2009-06-05T19:17:42Z")
[From Dick Robertson, 2009.06.05.1412CDT]
Rick,
What happened to your website? Has it been pirated, or did you give it up?
Warren’s PCTweb site lists four different sections of your website but when I wanted to show it to my wife, and clicked on all four separate links it delivered me to a completely unrelated web page…?
Dick R
> **···**
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Marken [rsmarken@GMAIL.COM](mailto:rsmarken@GMAIL.COM)
> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009 10:37 am
> Subject: Re: Signal Paths (was Hebbian learning)
> To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
>
> > [From Rick Marken (2009.06.05.0830)]
> >
> > > Bill Powers (2009.06.05.0703 MDT)–
> > >
> > > David Goldstein said, “Looks like Martin and Rick are at it
> > > again. Those two
> > > ought to get married.” I’m not quite sure what that means, but
> > > it’s funny
> > > anyway.
> >
> > Apparently the sense of humor is the second thing to go. But we
> > couldn’t get married in California anyway and, I’m afraid
> > Martin’s not
> > really my type. Now if Barak Obama wasn’t already married I’d be
> > planning my move to New Hampshire right away. That’s my kind of guy!
> >
> > > MT to Rick: Unfortunately for your wish, the system is not
> > > closed-loop with
> > > respect to the input from the presentation of the left or
> > > right light.
> > >
> > > BP:Not if you define the input quantity as a function of the
> > > presentation of
> > > the light alone.
> >
> > You’re just trying to steal Martin away from me by going at it again
> > with him yourself (saying what I would say, only better) and then
> > blaming me for being a meany. Masher!
> >
> > > MT to Rick: Also unfortunately for your wish, neither
> > > Schouten nor I have
> > > made any claim as to just what is perceived, so the issue of
> > > the behavioural
> > > illusion does not arise… The obvious
> > > fact that the button pushes are behaviour that controls some
> > > perception is
> > > irrelevant to either claim.
> > >
> > > BP: On the contrary, it is crucial.
> >
> > Hey, buddy, stop beating my time. Oh, never mind, he’s yours ;-(
> >
> > > It’s interesting that your remarks to Rick are coming more and
> > > more to
> > > resemble his remarks to you. Perhaps some form of civil union
> > > is indeed
> > > being foretold.
> >
> > No need to play the brave loser. I told you, you can have him.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > ## Rick
> >
> > Richard S. Marken PhD
> > [rsmarken@gmail.com](mailto:rsmarken@gmail.com)
---
### Author:  [@Fred\_Nickols1](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/Fred_Nickols1)
#### Post date: [June 5, 2009, 7:27pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/what-happened-to-mindreadings-com/12293/2 "2009-06-05T19:27:41Z")
[From Fred Nickols (2009.06.05.1326 MDT)]
I just went to the site and got the option to back order it. It also indicated that if you are the current domain owner you need to renew it pronto.
www.mindreadings.com
> **···**
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Fred Nickols
> Managing Partner
> Distance Consulting, LLC
> nickols@att.net
> www.nickols.us
>
> "Assistance at A Distance"
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Robertson Richard \
>
> > [From Dick Robertson, 2009.06.05.1412CDT]
> >
> > Rick,
> >
> > What happened to your website? Has it been pirated, or did you give it up?
> > Warren's PCTweb site lists four different sections of your website but when I
> > wanted to show it to my wife, and clicked on all four separate links it
> > delivered me to a completely unrelated web page...?
> >
> > Dick R
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Richard Marken \
> > Date: Friday, June 5, 2009 10:37 am
> > Subject: Re: Signal Paths (was Hebbian learning)
> > To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
> >
> > \> [From Rick Marken (2009.06.05.0830)]
> > \>
> > \> \> Bill Powers (2009.06.05.0703 MDT)--
> > \> \>
> > \> \> David Goldstein said, "Looks like Martin and Rick are at it
> > \> again. Those two
> > \> \> ought to get married." I'm not quite sure what that means, but
> > \> it's funny
> > \> \> anyway.
> > \>
> > \> Apparently the sense of humor is the second thing to go. But we
> > \> couldn't get married in California anyway and, I'm afraid
> > \> Martin's not
> > \> really my type. Now if Barak Obama wasn't already married I'd be
> > \> planning my move to New Hampshire right away. That's my kind of guy!
> > \>
> > \> \> MT to Rick: Unfortunately for your wish, the system is not
> > \> closed-loop with
> > \> \> respect to the input from the presentation of the left or
> > \> right light.
> > \> \>
> > \> \> BP:Not if you define the input quantity as a function of the
> > \> presentation of
> > \> \> the light alone.
> > \>
> > \> You're just trying to steal Martin away from me by going at it again
> > \> with him yourself (saying what I would say, only better) and then
> > \> blaming me for being a meany. Masher!
> > \>
> > \> \> MT to Rick: Also unfortunately for your wish, neither
> > \> Schouten nor I have
> > \> \> made any claim as to just what is perceived, so the issue of
> > \> the behavioural
> > \> \> illusion does not arise... The obvious
> > \> \> fact that the button pushes are behaviour that controls some
> > \> perception is
> > \> \> irrelevant to either claim.
> > \> \>
> > \> \> BP: On the contrary, it is crucial.
> > \>
> > \> Hey, buddy, stop beating my time. Oh, never mind, he's yours ;-(
> > \>
> > \> \> It's interesting that your remarks to Rick are coming more and
> > \> more to
> > \> \> resemble his remarks to you. Perhaps some form of civil union
> > \> is indeed
> > \> \> being foretold.
> > \>
> > \> No need to play the brave loser. I told you, you can have him.
> > \>
> > \> Best
> > \>
> > \> Rick
> > \> --
> > \> Richard S. Marken PhD
> > \> rsmarken@gmail.com
---
### Author:  [@Fred\_Nickols1](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/Fred_Nickols1)
#### Post date: [June 5, 2009, 7:29pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/what-happened-to-mindreadings-com/12293/3 "2009-06-05T19:29:23Z")
P.S. The site is Network Solutions and it says mindreadings.com expired on May 26.
> **···**
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Fred Nickols
> Managing Partner
> Distance Consulting, LLC
> nickols@att.net
> www.nickols.us
>
> "Assistance at A Distance"
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "nickols@att.net" \
>
> > [From Fred Nickols (2009.06.05.1326 MDT)]
>
> I just went to the site and got the option to back order it. It also indicated
>
> > that if you are the current domain owner you need to renew it pronto.
> >
> > www.mindreadings.com
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Fred Nickols
> > Managing Partner
> > Distance Consulting, LLC
> > nickols@att.net
> > www.nickols.us
> >
> > "Assistance at A Distance"
> >
> > -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: Robertson Richard \
> > \>
> > \> [From Dick Robertson, 2009.06.05.1412CDT]
> > \>
> > \> Rick,
> > \>
> > \> What happened to your website? Has it been pirated, or did you give it up?
> > \> Warren's PCTweb site lists four different sections of your website but when I
> > \> wanted to show it to my wife, and clicked on all four separate links it
> > \> delivered me to a completely unrelated web page...?
> > \>
> > \> Dick R
> > \>
> > \>
> > \> ----- Original Message -----
> > \> From: Richard Marken \
> > \> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009 10:37 am
> > \> Subject: Re: Signal Paths (was Hebbian learning)
> > \> To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
> > \>
> > \> \> [From Rick Marken (2009.06.05.0830)]
> > \> \>
> > \> \> \> Bill Powers (2009.06.05.0703 MDT)--
> > \> \> \>
> > \> \> \> David Goldstein said, "Looks like Martin and Rick are at it
> > \> \> again. Those two
> > \> \> \> ought to get married." I'm not quite sure what that means, but
> > \> \> it's funny
> > \> \> \> anyway.
> > \> \>
> > \> \> Apparently the sense of humor is the second thing to go. But we
> > \> \> couldn't get married in California anyway and, I'm afraid
> > \> \> Martin's not
> > \> \> really my type. Now if Barak Obama wasn't already married I'd be
> > \> \> planning my move to New Hampshire right away. That's my kind of guy!
> > \> \>
> > \> \> \> MT to Rick: Unfortunately for your wish, the system is not
> > \> \> closed-loop with
> > \> \> \> respect to the input from the presentation of the left or
> > \> \> right light.
> > \> \> \>
> > \> \> \> BP:Not if you define the input quantity as a function of the
> > \> \> presentation of
> > \> \> \> the light alone.
> > \> \>
> > \> \> You're just trying to steal Martin away from me by going at it again
> > \> \> with him yourself (saying what I would say, only better) and then
> > \> \> blaming me for being a meany. Masher!
> > \> \>
> > \> \> \> MT to Rick: Also unfortunately for your wish, neither
> > \> \> Schouten nor I have
> > \> \> \> made any claim as to just what is perceived, so the issue of
> > \> \> the behavioural
> > \> \> \> illusion does not arise... The obvious
> > \> \> \> fact that the button pushes are behaviour that controls some
> > \> \> perception is
> > \> \> \> irrelevant to either claim.
> > \> \> \>
> > \> \> \> BP: On the contrary, it is crucial.
> > \> \>
> > \> \> Hey, buddy, stop beating my time. Oh, never mind, he's yours ;-(
> > \> \>
> > \> \> \> It's interesting that your remarks to Rick are coming more and
> > \> \> more to
> > \> \> \> resemble his remarks to you. Perhaps some form of civil union
> > \> \> is indeed
> > \> \> \> being foretold.
> > \> \>
> > \> \> No need to play the brave loser. I told you, you can have him.
> > \> \>
> > \> \> Best
> > \> \>
> > \> \> Rick
> > \> \> --
> > \> \> Richard S. Marken PhD
> > \> \> rsmarken@gmail.com
> > \>
---
### Author:  [@rsmarken](http://discourse.iapct.org/u/rsmarken)
#### Post date: [June 5, 2009, 7:30pm UTC](http://discourse.iapct.org/t/what-happened-to-mindreadings-com/12293/4 "2009-06-05T19:30:58Z")
[From Rick Marken (2009.06.05.1230)]
Yikes!! Thanks. It looks like someone took it over. I better get on
it. Good thing I took today off.
Best
Rick
> **···**
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Robertson Richard\ wrote:
>
> > [From Dick Robertson, 2009.06.05.1412CDT]
> >
> > Rick,
> >
> > What happened to your website? Has it been pirated, or did you give it up?
> > Warren's PCTweb site lists four different sections of your website but when
> > I wanted to show it to my wife, and� clicked on all four separate links it
> > delivered me to a completely unrelated web page...?
> >
> > Dick R
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Richard Marken \
> > Date: Friday, June 5, 2009 10:37 am
> > Subject: Re: Signal Paths (was Hebbian learning)
> > To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
> >
> > > [From Rick Marken (2009.06.05.0830)]
> > >
> > > \>� Bill Powers (2009.06.05.0703 MDT)--
> > > \>
> > > \> David Goldstein said, "Looks like Martin and Rick are at it
> > > again. Those two
> > > \> ought to get married." I'm not quite sure what that means, but
> > > it's funny
> > > \> anyway.
> > >
> > > Apparently the sense of humor is the second thing to go. But we
> > > couldn't get married in California anyway and, I'm afraid
> > > Martin's not
> > > really my type. Now if Barak Obama wasn't already married I'd be
> > > planning my move to New Hampshire right away. That's my kind of guy!
> > >
> > > \> MT to Rick: Unfortunately for your wish, the system is not
> > > closed-loop with
> > > \> respect to the input from the presentation of the left or
> > > right light.
> > > \>
> > > \> BP:Not if you define the input quantity as a function of the
> > > presentation of
> > > \> the light alone.
> > >
> > > You're just trying to steal Martin away from me by going at it again
> > > with him yourself (saying what I would say, only better) and then
> > > blaming me for being a meany. Masher!
> > >
> > > \> �MT to Rick: Also unfortunately for your wish, neither
> > > Schouten nor I have
> > > \> made any claim as to just what is perceived, so the issue of
> > > the behavioural
> > > \> illusion does not arise... The obvious
> > > \> fact that the button pushes are behaviour that controls some
> > > perception is
> > > \> irrelevant to either claim.
> > > \>
> > > \> BP: On the contrary, it is crucial.
> > >
> > > Hey, buddy, stop beating my time. Oh, never mind, he's yours ;-(
> > >
> > > \> It's interesting that your remarks to Rick are coming more and
> > > more to
> > > \> resemble his remarks to you. Perhaps some form of civil union
> > > is indeed
> > > \> being foretold.
> > >
> > > No need to play the brave loser. I told you, you can have him.
> > >
> > > Best
> > >
> > > Rick
> > > --
> > > Richard S. Marken PhD
> > > rsmarken@gmail.com
>
> --
> Richard S. Marken PhD
> rsmarken@gmail.com