Where we go from here with PCT

Dear all

I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as everyone
else who I could think of who might have an interest in the future of
PCT (this includes the many people listed on the public list of PCT
researchers, students and practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site). As
you know, Bill Powers passed away on May 24th. This was a great
personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as a father, brother or
friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to those of us
involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was not
only the developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to teach
his theory to others. Now those of us who recognize the importance of
PCT and are excited about its future must carry on without Bill's
gentle but steady hand on the tiller, ready to right us when we go
wrong (as he righted me when I so often went wrong).

So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future of
PCT to suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one
suggestion from David Goldstein, which I think is a very good one.
That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we go
through _Behavior: The Control of Perception_, chapter by chapter and
discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying to
make, research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and what
kinds of research is suggested by the points made in the chapter.
David and I would be the "guides" in this course but there will be no
"teacher"; all participants would be bother teachers and students.

In order to make such a course work I think all those who would like
to participate should be able to go to one place to have the
discussion. I think the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So I
suggest that if you want to participate in the course (or just listen
in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email to:

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

The course could then just be a "thread" in the CSG discussion.

If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together for
such a course (and I'm sure there are better ideas; I'm pretty old
fashioned when it comes to the internet) please feel free to let me
know.

What I like about David's idea for a course on B:CP is that it honors
Bill's most important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that are
PCT). I also like it because it gets all of us who are working on PCT
together so that we can keep each other "honest" as we go about our
business of extending that legacy (Bill was very big on subjecting
one's own ideas to critical -- and, of course, empirical-- test;
especially the ideas that you are most in love with).

So that's my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many of you
will get involved in this "course". The future of PCT depends on us
(and especially you younger folks).

Best regards

Rick

Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com

Rick,

Count me in. I think going through the text as a group is a great idea!

Andrew

···

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Richard Marken rsmarken@gmail.com wrote:

Dear all

I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as everyone

else who I could think of who might have an interest in the future of

PCT (this includes the many people listed on the public list of PCT

researchers, students and practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site). As

you know, Bill Powers passed away on May 24th. This was a great

personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as a father, brother or

friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to those of us

involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was not

only the developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to teach

his theory to others. Now those of us who recognize the importance of

PCT and are excited about its future must carry on without Bill’s

gentle but steady hand on the tiller, ready to right us when we go

wrong (as he righted me when I so often went wrong).

So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future of

PCT to suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one

suggestion from David Goldstein, which I think is a very good one.

That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we go

through Behavior: The Control of Perception, chapter by chapter and

discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying to

make, research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and what

kinds of research is suggested by the points made in the chapter.

David and I would be the “guides” in this course but there will be no

“teacher”; all participants would be bother teachers and students.

In order to make such a course work I think all those who would like

to participate should be able to go to one place to have the

discussion. I think the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So I

suggest that if you want to participate in the course (or just listen

in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email to:

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

The course could then just be a “thread” in the CSG discussion.

If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together for

such a course (and I’m sure there are better ideas; I’m pretty old

fashioned when it comes to the internet) please feel free to let me

know.

What I like about David’s idea for a course on B:CP is that it honors

Bill’s most important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that are

PCT). I also like it because it gets all of us who are working on PCT

together so that we can keep each other “honest” as we go about our

business of extending that legacy (Bill was very big on subjecting

one’s own ideas to critical – and, of course, empirical-- test;

especially the ideas that you are most in love with).

So that’s my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many of you

will get involved in this “course”. The future of PCT depends on us

(and especially you younger folks).

Best regards

Rick

Richard S. Marken PhD

rsmarken@gmail.com

www.mindreadings.com

[From Lloyd Klinedinst (2013.06.09.1945 CDT)]

ditto

Lloyd

Count me in. I think going through the text as a group is a great idea!

Dr. Lloyd Klinedinst
10 Dover Lane
Villa Ridge, MO 63089-2001
HomeVoice: (636) 451-3232

Lloyd Mobile: (314)-609-5571
email: lloydk@klinedinst.com

website: http://www.klinedinst.com

···

On Jun 9, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Andrew Nichols anicholslcsw@GMAIL.COM wrote:

I'm in.

Fred Nickols

From: Richard Marken [mailto:rsmarken@GMAIL.COM]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013 5:35 PM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Where we go from here with PCT

Dear all

I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as everyone else

who I

could think of who might have an interest in the future of PCT (this

includes

the many people listed on the public list of PCT researchers, students and
practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site). As you know, Bill Powers passed

away

on May 24th. This was a great personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as

a

father, brother or friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to

those of us

involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was not only

the

developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to teach his theory to
others. Now those of us who recognize the importance of PCT and are
excited about its future must carry on without Bill's gentle but steady

hand

on the tiller, ready to right us when we go wrong (as he righted me when I

so

often went wrong).

So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future of PCT

to

suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one suggestion from
David Goldstein, which I think is a very good one.
That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we go
through _Behavior: The Control of Perception_, chapter by chapter and
discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying to make,
research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and what kinds of
research is suggested by the points made in the chapter.
David and I would be the "guides" in this course but there will be no
"teacher"; all participants would be bother teachers and students.

In order to make such a course work I think all those who would like to
participate should be able to go to one place to have the discussion. I

think

the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So I suggest that if you want

to

participate in the course (or just listen
in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email to:

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

The course could then just be a "thread" in the CSG discussion.

If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together for such a
course (and I'm sure there are better ideas; I'm pretty old fashioned when

it

comes to the internet) please feel free to let me know.

What I like about David's idea for a course on B:CP is that it honors

Bill's most

important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that are PCT). I also like it
because it gets all of us who are working on PCT together so that we can
keep each other "honest" as we go about our business of extending that
legacy (Bill was very big on subjecting one's own ideas to critical --

and, of

course, empirical-- test; especially the ideas that you are most in love

with).

So that's my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many of you

will

get involved in this "course". The future of PCT depends on us (and

especially

···

-----Original Message-----
you younger folks).

Best regards

Rick

Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com

David and Rick:
I’m in! (I’ll figure out how to change my e-address on the CSGlist when I get home.)
This is brilliant! Of all the ideas I’ve thought and heard about the future of PDT and CSG this is a simple “elegant” immediate beginning. I’m guessing it will appeal to the researchers and educators on this distinguished list.

Thank you both for a real step forward.

Alice

Alice Powers McElhone

73 Essex Avenue #6

Bloomfield, NJ 07003

apmce@benchpress.com.

···

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Marken rsmarken@gmail.com

To: Alison Powers controlsystemsgroupconference@gmail.com

Cc: Alice McElhone apmcelhone@aol.com; bbabbott@frontier.com bbabbott@frontier.com; Dag Forssell dag@livingcontrolsystems.com; Warren Mansell wmansell@gmail.com; Sara Tai sara.tai@manchester.ac.uk; Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au; mmt@mmtaylor.net mmt@mmtaylor.net; Henry Yin hy43@duke.edu; Bill Powers powers_w@frontier.net; Bruce Nevin bruce.nevin@gmail.com; rjrobertson2@comcast.net rjrobertson2@comcast.net; 328babs . bara0361@gmail.com; Denny Powers denny68flh@gmail.com; McClelland, Kent MCCLEL@grinnell.edu; Hugh Petrie hgpetrie@acsu.buffalo.edu; Gary Cziko gcziko@gmail.com; Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet) CSGNET@listserv.illinois.edu; Mike Mermel mmermel@mikemermel.com; Autumn Winter 1@aut.me; Richard Pfau richardpfau4153@aol.com; isabel.adeyemi isabel.adeyemi@manchester.ac.uk; sarah_alsawy sarah_alsawy@live.co.uk; heather.bell heather.bell@uleth.ca; alec.brady alec.brady@behavioural.org.uk; emma.burns emma.burns@police.govt.nz; amnachoudry amnachoudry@hotmail.co.uk; janakacooray janakacooray@gmail.com; farrell.pse farrell.pse@gmail.com; emma.fowler-2 emma.fowler-2@student.manchester.ac.uk; hannah.gaffney hannah.gaffney@manchester.ac.uk; davidgoldsteinphd davidgoldsteinphd@gmail.com; dougal.hare dougal.hare@manchester.ac.uk; mail mail@nchawkes.com; cehalav cehalav@gmail.com; kellyh82 kellyh82@live.co.uk; amy.jones-3 amy.jones-3@student.manchester.ac.uk; 4res4cp2mk 4res4cp2mk@gmail.com; devpriyak devpriyak@gmail.com; d.laila d.laila@soton.ac.uk; dunya.latif-aramesh dunya.latif-aramesh@student.manchester.ac.uk; kieranmatthijslord kieranmatthijslord@hotmail.com; rsmarken rsmarken@gmail.com; adam.matic adam.matic@gmail.com; susan.mccormack47 susan.mccormack47@gmail.com; davidwm40 davidwm40@hotmail.com; n.j.moberly n.j.moberly@ex.ac.uk; r.k.moore r.k.moore@dcs.shef.ac.uk; morris_lydia morris_lydia@hotmail.com; richardmullan richardmullan@mac.com; elizabeth.murphy elizabeth.murphy@manchester.ac.uk; g.niezen g.niezen@swansea.ac.uk; rachel.oconnor rachel.oconnor@student.manchester.ac.uk; irishi62305 irishi62305@yahoo.com; suzanna.parsons suzanna.parsons@student.manchester.ac.uk; trishna.patel trishna.patel@oxleas.nhs.uk; pellis pellis@uleth.ca; fplooij fplooij@kiddygroup.com; siddhi.poyarekar siddhi.poyarekar@gmail.com; zr zr@zinovi.net; kate.roughley kate.roughley@manchester.ac.uk; vaneeta.sadhnani vaneeta.sadhnani@nhs.net; oliver.s oliver.s@telia.com; rzspijk rzspijk@gmail.com; cmspratt cmspratt@xalt.co.uk; agsteven agsteven@stetson.edu; clairesti clairesti@hotmail.co.uk; naomi.taylor naomi.taylor@student.manchester.ac.uk; dougturk dougturk@aol.com; Filippo.Varese Filippo.Varese@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk; guy.vernon guy.vernon@student.manchester.ac.uk; jason jason@jason-wright.com; K.A.Wright K.A.Wright@ex.ac.uk; rupert rupert@moonsit.co.uk

Sent: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 3:35 pm

Subject: Where we go from here with PCT

`
Dear all
I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as everyone
else who I could think of who might have an interest in the future of
PCT (this includes the many people listed on the public list of PCT
researchers, students and practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site). As
you know, Bill Powers passed away on May 24th. This was a great
personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as a father, brother or
friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to those of us
involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was not
only the developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to teach
his theory to others. Now those of us who recognize the importance of
PCT and are excited about its future must carry on without Bill's
gentle but steady hand on the tiller, ready to right us when we go
wrong (as he righted me when I so often went wrong).
So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future of
PCT to suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one
suggestion from David Goldstein, which I think is a very good one.
That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we go
through _Behavior: The Control of Perception_, chapter by chapter and
discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying to
make, research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and what
kinds of research is suggested by the points made in the chapter.
David and I would be the "guides" in this course but there will be no
"teacher"; all participants would be bother teachers and students.
In order to make such a course work I think all those who would like
to participate should be able to go to one place to have the
discussion. I think the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So I
suggest that if you want to participate in the course (or just listen
in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email to:
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:
SUBSCRIBE CSGNET
The course could then just be a "thread" in the CSG discussion.
If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together for
such a course (and I'm sure there are better ideas; I'm pretty old
fashioned when it comes to the internet) please feel free to let me
know.
What I like about David's idea for a course on B:CP is that it honors
Bill's most important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that are
PCT). I also like it because it gets all of us who are working on PCT
together so that we can keep each other "honest" as we go about our
business of extending that legacy (Bill was very big on subjecting
one's own ideas to critical -- and, of course, empirical-- test;
especially the ideas that you are most in love with).
So that's my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many of you
will get involved in this "course". The future of PCT depends on us
(and especially you younger folks).
Best regards
Rick
Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
[www.mindreadings.com](http://www.mindreadings.com)
`

Hello David and Rick,

I’m a starter !

Grace Gadsby.

···

----- Original Message -----

From:
Alice McElhone

To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 5:10 AM

Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

David and Rick:
I’m in! (I’ll figure out how to change my e-address on the CSGlist when I get home.)
This is brilliant! Of all the ideas I’ve thought and heard about the future of PDT and CSG this is a simple “elegant” immediate beginning. I’m guessing it will appeal to the researchers and educators on this distinguished list.

Thank you both for a real step forward.

Alice

Alice Powers McElhone
73 Essex Avenue #6
Bloomfield, NJ 07003

apmce@benchpress.com.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Marken rsmarken@gmail.com
To: Alison Powers controlsystemsgroupconference@gmail.com
Cc: Alice McElhone apmcelhone@aol.com; bbabbott@frontier.com bbabbott@frontier.com; Dag Forssell dag@livingcontrolsystems.com; Warren Mansell wmansell@gmail.com; Sara Tai sara.tai@manchester.ac.uk; Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au; mmt@mmtaylor.net mmt@mmtaylor.net; Henry Yin hy43@duke.edu; Bill Powers powers_w@frontier.net; Bruce Nevin bruce.nevin@gmail.com; rjrobertson2@comcast.net rjrobertson2@comcast.net; 328babs . bara0361@gmail.com; Denny Powers denny68flh@gmail.com; McClelland, Kent MCCLEL@grinnell.edu; Hugh Petrie hgpetrie@acsu.buffalo.edu; Gary Cziko gcziko@gmail.com; Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet) CSGNET@listserv.illinois.edu; Mike Mermel mmermel@mikemermel.com; Autumn Winter 1@aut.me; Richard Pfau richardpfau4153@aol.com; isabel.adeyemi isabel.adeyemi@manchester.ac.uk; sarah_alsawy sarah_alsawy@live.co.uk; heather.bell heather.bell@uleth.ca; alec.brady alec.brady@behavioural.org.uk; emma.burns emma.burns@police.govt.nz; amnachoudry amnachoudry@hotmail.co.uk; janakacooray janakacooray@gmail.com; farrell.pse farrell.pse@gmail.com; emma.fowler-2 emma.fowler-2@student.manchester.ac.uk; hannah.gaffney hannah.gaffney@manchester.ac.uk; davidgoldsteinphd davidgoldsteinphd@gmail.com; dougal.hare dougal.hare@manchester.ac.uk; mail mail@nchawkes.com; cehalav cehalav@gmail.com; kellyh82 kellyh82@live.co.uk; amy.jones-3 amy.jones-3@student.manchester.ac.uk; 4res4cp2mk 4res4cp2mk@gmail.com; devpriyak devpriyak@gmail.com; d.laila d.laila@soton.ac.uk; dunya.latif-aramesh dunya.latif-aramesh@student.manchester.ac.uk; kieranmatthijslord kieranmatthijslord@hotmail.com; rsmarken rsmarken@gmail.com; adam.matic adam.matic@gmail.com; susan.mccormack47 susan.mccormack47@gmail.com; davidwm40 davidwm40@hotmail.com; n.j.moberly n.j.moberly@ex.ac.uk; r.k.moore r.k.moore@dcs.shef.ac.uk; morris_lydia morris_lydia@hotmail.com; richardmullan richardmullan@mac.com; elizabeth.murphy elizabeth.murphy@manchester.ac.uk; g.niezen g.niezen@swansea.ac.uk; rachel.oconnor rachel.oconnor@student.manchester.ac.uk; irishi62305 irishi62305@yahoo.com; suzanna.parsons suzanna.parsons@student.manchester.ac.uk; trishna.patel trishna.patel@oxleas.nhs.uk; pellis pellis@uleth.ca; fplooij fplooij@kiddygroup.com; siddhi.poyarekar siddhi.poyarekar@gmail.com; zr zr@zinovi.net; kate.roughley kate.roughley@manchester.ac.uk; vaneeta.sadhnani vaneeta.sadhnani@nhs.net; oliver.s oliver.s@telia.com; rzspijk rzspijk@gmail.com; cmspratt cmspratt@xalt.co.uk; agsteven agsteven@stetson.edu; clairesti clairesti@hotmail.co.uk; naomi.taylor naomi.taylor@student.manchester.ac.uk; dougturk dougturk@aol.com; Filippo.Varese Filippo.Varese@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk; guy.vernon guy.vernon@student.manchester.ac.uk; jason jason@jason-wright.com; K.A.Wright K.A.Wright@ex.ac.uk; rupert rupert@moonsit.co.uk
Sent: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 3:35 pm
Subject: Where we go from here with PCT

`
Dear all
I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as everyone
else who I could think of who might have an interest in the future of
PCT (this includes the many people listed on the public list of PCT
researchers, students and practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site). As
you know, Bill Powers passed away on May 24th. This was a great
personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as a father, brother or
friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to those of us
involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was not
only the developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to teach
his theory to others. Now those of us who recognize the importance of
PCT and are excited about its future must carry on without Bill's
gentle but steady hand on the tiller, ready to right us when we go
wrong (as he righted me when I so often went wrong).
So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future of
PCT to suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one
suggestion from David Goldstein, which I think is a very good one.
That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we go
through _Behavior: The Control of Perception_, chapter by chapter and
discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying to
make, research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and what
kinds of research is suggested by the points made in the chapter.
David and I would be the "guides" in this course but there will be no
"teacher"; all participants would be bother teachers and students.
In order to make such a course work I think all those who would like
to participate should be able to go to one place to have the
discussion. I think the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So I
suggest that if you want to participate in the course (or just listen
in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email to:
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:
SUBSCRIBE CSGNET
The course could then just be a "thread" in the CSG discussion.
If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together for
such a course (and I'm sure there are better ideas; I'm pretty old
fashioned when it comes to the internet) please feel free to let me
know.
What I like about David's idea for a course on B:CP is that it honors
Bill's most important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that are
PCT). I also like it because it gets all of us who are working on PCT
together so that we can keep each other "honest" as we go about our
business of extending that legacy (Bill was very big on subjecting
one's own ideas to critical -- and, of course, empirical-- test;
especially the ideas that you are most in love with).
So that's my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many of you
will get involved in this "course". The future of PCT depends on us
(and especially you younger folks).
Best regards
Rick
Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
[www.mindreadings.com](http://www.mindreadings.com)
`

Hi Alice et al

OK, I've already gotten "buy in" from several people, most of whom are
already on CSGNet. So apparently there is some interest in the class.
And there didn't seem to be any protest about using CSGNet. So here's
what I propose for now. I will start working with David Goldstein on a
syllabus and some materials for the class. I would like to shoot for
starting the class in the beginning of July. If you want to "enroll"
in the class, just subscribe to CSGNet using the simple procedure I
described in my original post in this thread. Just sent an email to

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with the words

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

in the body of the email.

Once you subscribe, you will start getting posts from the listserver
when people post things. If you are not interested in these posts
simply delete them. When the course starts you will receive posts that
start with "B:CP Course" or "Re: B:CP Course". These will be the posts
relevant to the course. When the course starts you can either just
read those posts or comment on them using "Reply", in which case the
post will be distributed to everyone in the course with the "Re:
BCP:Course" in the subject line.

So I envision the course being made up of a series "threads" defined
by the subject line in the email, but all subject lines will start
with "B:CP Course" or "Re: B:CP Course". For example, the thread
titles would be something like:

B:CP Course: Preface
B:CP Course: Chapter 1, The Dilemmas of Behaviorism
B:CP: Course: Chapter 2, Models and Generalizations
.
.
B:CP: Course: Chapter 18, Conflict and Control
B:CP Course :Appendix : Control System Operation and Stability

The text for the course could be either the 1973 or (preferably) the
2005 edition of B:CP. If the chapter names are use the people using
the 1973 edition would have no problem following along, except they
would be missing the important Emotion chapter that was not included
in the 1973 edition.

One last thing. Warren Mansell asked whether, at the end of each
chapter's discussion, a text version of the chapter be annotated with
links and consensual comments to act as a more concise archive than
the discussion itself. I would be willing to consider this if we can
get an electronic version of the text and that's something that Alice
would have to have a say in. I think Alice would have to be willing to
put a an electronic version of the text up on the net. If so, then
we'll try to include this in the course.

So there is no need to contact me any more to tell me that you want to
take the B:CP Course.

If you want to take the course, just SIGN UP FOR CSGNet and wait for
the posts headed "B:CP Course", which should start coming in July.

Best regards

Rick

···

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Alice McElhone <apmcelhone@aol.com> wrote:

David and Rick:

I'm in! (I'll figure out how to change my e-address on the CSGlist when I
get home.)

This is brilliant! Of all the ideas I've thought and heard about the future
of PDT and CSG this is a simple "elegant" immediate beginning. I'm guessing
it will appeal to the researchers and educators on this distinguished list.

Thank you both for a real step forward.

Alice

Alice Powers McElhone
73 Essex Avenue #6
Bloomfield, NJ 07003
apmce@benchpress.com.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Marken <rsmarken@gmail.com>
To: Alison Powers <controlsystemsgroupconference@gmail.com>
Cc: Alice McElhone <apmcelhone@aol.com>; <bbabbott@frontier.com>
<bbabbott@frontier.com>; Dag Forssell <dag@livingcontrolsystems.com>; Warren
Mansell <wmansell@gmail.com>; Sara Tai <sara.tai@manchester.ac.uk>;
<Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au> <Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au>; <mmt@mmtaylor.net>
<mmt@mmtaylor.net>; Henry Yin <hy43@duke.edu>; Bill Powers
<powers_w@frontier.net>; Bruce Nevin <bruce.nevin@gmail.com>;
<rjrobertson2@comcast.net> <rjrobertson2@comcast.net>; 328babs .
<bara0361@gmail.com>; Denny Powers <denny68flh@gmail.com>; McClelland, Kent
<MCCLEL@grinnell.edu>; Hugh Petrie <hgpetrie@acsu.buffalo.edu>; Gary Cziko
<gcziko@gmail.com>; Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)
<CSGNET@listserv.illinois.edu>; Mike Mermel <mmermel@mikemermel.com>; Autumn
Winter <1@aut.me>; Richard Pfau <richardpfau4153@aol.com>; isabel.adeyemi
<isabel.adeyemi@manchester.ac.uk>; sarah_alsawy <sarah_alsawy@live.co.uk>;
heather.bell <heather.bell@uleth.ca>; alec.brady
<alec.brady@behavioural.org.uk>; emma.burns <emma.burns@police.govt.nz>;
amnachoudry <amnachoudry@hotmail.co.uk>; janakacooray
<janakacooray@gmail.com>; farrell.pse <farrell.pse@gmail.com>; emma.fowler-2
<emma.fowler-2@student.manchester.ac.uk>; hannah.gaffney
<hannah.gaffney@manchester.ac.uk>; davidgoldsteinphd
<davidgoldsteinphd@gmail.com>; dougal.hare <dougal.hare@manchester.ac.uk>;
mail <mail@nchawkes.com>; cehalav <cehalav@gmail.com>; kellyh82
<kellyh82@live.co.uk>; amy.jones-3 <amy.jones-3@student.manchester.ac.uk>;
4res4cp2mk <4res4cp2mk@gmail.com>; devpriyak <devpriyak@gmail.com>; d.laila
<d.laila@soton.ac.uk>; dunya.latif-aramesh
<dunya.latif-aramesh@student.manchester.ac.uk>; kieranmatthijslord
<kieranmatthijslord@hotmail.com>; rsmarken <rsmarken@gmail.com>; adam.matic
<adam.matic@gmail.com>; susan.mccormack47 <susan.mccormack47@gmail.com>;
davidwm40 <davidwm40@hotmail.com>; n.j.moberly <n.j.moberly@ex.ac.uk>;
r.k.moore <r.k.moore@dcs.shef.ac.uk>; morris_lydia
<morris_lydia@hotmail.com>; richardmullan <richardmullan@mac.com>;
elizabeth.murphy <elizabeth.murphy@manchester.ac.uk>; g.niezen
<g.niezen@swansea.ac.uk>; rachel.oconnor
<rachel.oconnor@student.manchester.ac.uk>; irishi62305
<irishi62305@yahoo.com>; suzanna.parsons
<suzanna.parsons@student.manchester.ac.uk>; trishna.patel
<trishna.patel@oxleas.nhs.uk>; pellis <pellis@uleth.ca>; fplooij
<fplooij@kiddygroup.com>; siddhi.poyarekar <siddhi.poyarekar@gmail.com>; zr
<zr@zinovi.net>; kate.roughley <kate.roughley@manchester.ac.uk>;
vaneeta.sadhnani <vaneeta.sadhnani@nhs.net>; oliver.s <oliver.s@telia.com>;
rzspijk <rzspijk@gmail.com>; cmspratt <cmspratt@xalt.co.uk>; agsteven
<agsteven@stetson.edu>; clairesti <clairesti@hotmail.co.uk>; naomi.taylor
<naomi.taylor@student.manchester.ac.uk>; dougturk <dougturk@aol.com>;
Filippo.Varese <Filippo.Varese@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk>; guy.vernon
<guy.vernon@student.manchester.ac.uk>; jason <jason@jason-wright.com>;
K.A.Wright <K.A.Wright@ex.ac.uk>; rupert <rupert@moonsit.co.uk>
Sent: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 3:35 pm
Subject: Where we go from here with PCT

Dear all

I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as everyone
else who I could think of who might have an interest in the future of
PCT (this includes the many people listed on the public list of PCT
researchers, students and practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site). As
you know, Bill Powers passed away on May 24th. This was a great
personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as a father, brother or
friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to those of us
involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was not
only the developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to teach
his theory to others. Now those of us who recognize the importance of
PCT and are excited about its future must carry on without Bill's
gentle but steady hand on the tiller, ready to right us when we go
wrong (as he righted me when I so often went wrong).

So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future of
PCT to suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one
suggestion from David Goldstein, which I think is a very good one.
That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we go
through _Behavior: The Control of Perception_, chapter by chapter and
discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying to
make, research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and what
kinds of research is suggested by the points made in the chapter.
David and I would be the "guides" in this course but there will be no
"teacher"; all participants would be bother teachers and students.

In order to make such a course work I think all those who would like
to participate should be able to go to one place to have the
discussion. I think the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So I
suggest that if you want to participate in the course (or just listen
in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email to:

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

The course could then just be a "thread" in the CSG discussion.

If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together for
such a course (and I'm sure there are better ideas; I'm pretty old
fashioned when it comes to the internet) please feel free to let me
know.

What I like about David's idea for a course on B:CP is that it honors
Bill's most important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that are
PCT). I also like it because it gets all of us who are working on PCT
together so that we can keep each other "honest" as we go about our
business of extending that legacy (Bill was very big on subjecting
one's own ideas to critical -- and, of course, empirical-- test;
especially the ideas that you are most in love with).

So that's my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many of you
will get involved in this "course". The future of PCT depends on us
(and especially you younger folks).

Best regards

Rick

Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com

--
Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com

[Ted, Monday, June 10, 2013 5:40 PM MST]

Please count me in.

[Rick, Monday, June 10, 2013 4:46 PM]

OK, I've already gotten "buy in" from several people, most of whom are
already on CSGNet. So apparently there is some interest in the class.
And there didn't seem to be any protest about using CSGNet. So here's
what I propose for now. I will start working with David Goldstein on a
syllabus and some materials for the class. I would like to shoot for
starting the class in the beginning of July. If you want to "enroll"
in the class, just subscribe to CSGNet using the simple procedure I
described in my original post in this thread. Just sent an email to

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with the words

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

in the body of the email.

Once you subscribe, you will start getting posts from the listserver
when people post things. If you are not interested in these posts
simply delete them. When the course starts you will receive posts that
start with "B:CP Course" or "Re: B:CP Course". These will be the posts
relevant to the course. When the course starts you can either just
read those posts or comment on them using "Reply", in which case the
post will be distributed to everyone in the course with the "Re:
BCP:Course" in the subject line.

So I envision the course being made up of a series "threads" defined
by the subject line in the email, but all subject lines will start
with "B:CP Course" or "Re: B:CP Course". For example, the thread
titles would be something like:

B:CP Course: Preface
B:CP Course: Chapter 1, The Dilemmas of Behaviorism
B:CP: Course: Chapter 2, Models and Generalizations
.
.
B:CP: Course: Chapter 18, Conflict and Control
B:CP Course :Appendix : Control System Operation and Stability

The text for the course could be either the 1973 or (preferably) the
2005 edition of B:CP. If the chapter names are use the people using
the 1973 edition would have no problem following along, except they
would be missing the important Emotion chapter that was not included
in the 1973 edition.

One last thing. Warren Mansell asked whether, at the end of each
chapter's discussion, a text version of the chapter be annotated with
links and consensual comments to act as a more concise archive than
the discussion itself. I would be willing to consider this if we can
get an electronic version of the text and that's something that Alice
would have to have a say in. I think Alice would have to be willing to
put a an electronic version of the text up on the net. If so, then
we'll try to include this in the course.

So there is no need to contact me any more to tell me that you want to
take the B:CP Course.

If you want to take the course, just SIGN UP FOR CSGNet and wait for
the posts headed "B:CP Course", which should start coming in July.

Best regards

Rick

David and Rick:

I'm in! (I'll figure out how to change my e-address on the CSGlist when I
get home.)

This is brilliant! Of all the ideas I've thought and heard about the

future

of PDT and CSG this is a simple "elegant" immediate beginning. I'm

guessing

it will appeal to the researchers and educators on this distinguished

list.

Thank you both for a real step forward.

Alice

Alice Powers McElhone
73 Essex Avenue #6
Bloomfield, NJ 07003
apmce@benchpress.com.

From: Richard Marken <rsmarken@gmail.com>
To: Alison Powers <controlsystemsgroupconference@gmail.com>
Cc: Alice McElhone <apmcelhone@aol.com>; <bbabbott@frontier.com>
<bbabbott@frontier.com>; Dag Forssell <dag@livingcontrolsystems.com>;

Warren

Mansell <wmansell@gmail.com>; Sara Tai <sara.tai@manchester.ac.uk>;
<Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au> <Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au>;

<mmt@mmtaylor.net>

<mmt@mmtaylor.net>; Henry Yin <hy43@duke.edu>; Bill Powers
<powers_w@frontier.net>; Bruce Nevin <bruce.nevin@gmail.com>;
<rjrobertson2@comcast.net> <rjrobertson2@comcast.net>; 328babs .
<bara0361@gmail.com>; Denny Powers <denny68flh@gmail.com>; McClelland,

Kent

<MCCLEL@grinnell.edu>; Hugh Petrie <hgpetrie@acsu.buffalo.edu>; Gary Cziko
<gcziko@gmail.com>; Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)
<CSGNET@listserv.illinois.edu>; Mike Mermel <mmermel@mikemermel.com>;

Autumn

Winter <1@aut.me>; Richard Pfau <richardpfau4153@aol.com>; isabel.adeyemi
<isabel.adeyemi@manchester.ac.uk>; sarah_alsawy <sarah_alsawy@live.co.uk>;
heather.bell <heather.bell@uleth.ca>; alec.brady
<alec.brady@behavioural.org.uk>; emma.burns <emma.burns@police.govt.nz>;
amnachoudry <amnachoudry@hotmail.co.uk>; janakacooray
<janakacooray@gmail.com>; farrell.pse <farrell.pse@gmail.com>;

emma.fowler-2

<emma.fowler-2@student.manchester.ac.uk>; hannah.gaffney
<hannah.gaffney@manchester.ac.uk>; davidgoldsteinphd
<davidgoldsteinphd@gmail.com>; dougal.hare <dougal.hare@manchester.ac.uk>;
mail <mail@nchawkes.com>; cehalav <cehalav@gmail.com>; kellyh82
<kellyh82@live.co.uk>; amy.jones-3 <amy.jones-3@student.manchester.ac.uk>;
4res4cp2mk <4res4cp2mk@gmail.com>; devpriyak <devpriyak@gmail.com>;

d.laila

<d.laila@soton.ac.uk>; dunya.latif-aramesh
<dunya.latif-aramesh@student.manchester.ac.uk>; kieranmatthijslord
<kieranmatthijslord@hotmail.com>; rsmarken <rsmarken@gmail.com>;

adam.matic

<adam.matic@gmail.com>; susan.mccormack47 <susan.mccormack47@gmail.com>;
davidwm40 <davidwm40@hotmail.com>; n.j.moberly <n.j.moberly@ex.ac.uk>;
r.k.moore <r.k.moore@dcs.shef.ac.uk>; morris_lydia
<morris_lydia@hotmail.com>; richardmullan <richardmullan@mac.com>;
elizabeth.murphy <elizabeth.murphy@manchester.ac.uk>; g.niezen
<g.niezen@swansea.ac.uk>; rachel.oconnor
<rachel.oconnor@student.manchester.ac.uk>; irishi62305
<irishi62305@yahoo.com>; suzanna.parsons
<suzanna.parsons@student.manchester.ac.uk>; trishna.patel
<trishna.patel@oxleas.nhs.uk>; pellis <pellis@uleth.ca>; fplooij
<fplooij@kiddygroup.com>; siddhi.poyarekar <siddhi.poyarekar@gmail.com>;

zr

<zr@zinovi.net>; kate.roughley <kate.roughley@manchester.ac.uk>;
vaneeta.sadhnani <vaneeta.sadhnani@nhs.net>; oliver.s

<oliver.s@telia.com>;

···

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Alice McElhone <apmcelhone@aol.com> wrote:

-----Original Message-----
rzspijk <rzspijk@gmail.com>; cmspratt <cmspratt@xalt.co.uk>; agsteven
<agsteven@stetson.edu>; clairesti <clairesti@hotmail.co.uk>; naomi.taylor
<naomi.taylor@student.manchester.ac.uk>; dougturk <dougturk@aol.com>;
Filippo.Varese <Filippo.Varese@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk>; guy.vernon
<guy.vernon@student.manchester.ac.uk>; jason <jason@jason-wright.com>;
K.A.Wright <K.A.Wright@ex.ac.uk>; rupert <rupert@moonsit.co.uk>
Sent: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 3:35 pm
Subject: Where we go from here with PCT

Dear all

I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as everyone
else who I could think of who might have an interest in the future of
PCT (this includes the many people listed on the public list of PCT
researchers, students and practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site). As
you know, Bill Powers passed away on May 24th. This was a great
personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as a father, brother or
friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to those of us
involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was not
only the developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to teach
his theory to others. Now those of us who recognize the importance of
PCT and are excited about its future must carry on without Bill's
gentle but steady hand on the tiller, ready to right us when we go
wrong (as he righted me when I so often went wrong).

So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future of
PCT to suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one
suggestion from David Goldstein, which I think is a very good one.
That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we go
through _Behavior: The Control of Perception_, chapter by chapter and
discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying to
make, research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and what
kinds of research is suggested by the points made in the chapter.
David and I would be the "guides" in this course but there will be no
"teacher"; all participants would be bother teachers and students.

In order to make such a course work I think all those who would like
to participate should be able to go to one place to have the
discussion. I think the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So I
suggest that if you want to participate in the course (or just listen
in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email to:

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

The course could then just be a "thread" in the CSG discussion.

If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together for
such a course (and I'm sure there are better ideas; I'm pretty old
fashioned when it comes to the internet) please feel free to let me
know.

What I like about David's idea for a course on B:CP is that it honors
Bill's most important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that are
PCT). I also like it because it gets all of us who are working on PCT
together so that we can keep each other "honest" as we go about our
business of extending that legacy (Bill was very big on subjecting
one's own ideas to critical -- and, of course, empirical-- test;
especially the ideas that you are most in love with).

So that's my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many of you
will get involved in this "course". The future of PCT depends on us
(and especially you younger folks).

Best regards

Rick

Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com

--
Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com

Hi Alice et al

OK, I’ve already gotten “buy in” from several people, most of
whom are

already on CSGNet. So apparently there is some interest in the
class.

And there didn’t seem to be any protest about using CSGNet. So
here’s

what I propose for now. I will start working with David Goldstein on
a

syllabus and some materials for the class. I would like to shoot for

starting the class in the beginning of July. If you want to
“enroll”

in the class, just subscribe to CSGNet using the simple procedure I

described in my original post in this thread. Just sent an email
to

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with the words

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

in the body of the email.

Once you subscribe, you will start getting posts from the listserver

when people post things. If you are not interested in these posts

simply delete them. When the course starts you will receive posts
that

start with “B:CP Course” or “Re: B:CP Course”. These
will be the posts

relevant to the course. When the course starts you can either just

read those posts or comment on them using “Reply”, in which
case the

post will be distributed to everyone in the course with the
"Re:

BCP:Course" in the subject line.

So I envision the course being made up of a series “threads”
defined

by the subject line in the email, but all subject lines will start

with “B:CP Course” or “Re: B:CP Course”. For example,
the thread

titles would be something like:

B:CP Course: Preface

B:CP Course: Chapter 1, The Dilemmas of Behaviorism

B:CP: Course: Chapter 2, Models and Generalizations

.

.

B:CP: Course: Chapter 18, Conflict and Control

B:CP Course :Appendix : Control System Operation and Stability

The text for the course could be either the 1973 or (preferably) the

2005 edition of B:CP. If the chapter names are use the people using

the 1973 edition would have no problem following along, except they

would be missing the important Emotion chapter that was not included

in the 1973 edition.

One last thing. Warren Mansell asked whether, at the end of each

chapter’s discussion, a text version of the chapter be annotated
with

links and consensual comments to act as a more concise archive than

the discussion itself. I would be willing to consider this if we can

get an electronic version of the text and that’s something that
Alice

would have to have a say in. I think Alice would have to be willing
to

put a an electronic version of the text up on the net. If so, then

we’ll try to include this in the course.

So there is no need to contact me any more to tell me that you want
to

take the B:CP Course.

If you want to take the course, just SIGN UP FOR CSGNet and wait for

the posts headed “B:CP Course”, which should start coming in
July.

Best regards

Rick

David and Rick:

I’m in! (I’ll figure out how to change my e-address on the CSGlist
when I

get home.)

This is brilliant! Of all the ideas I’ve thought and heard about the
future

of PDT and CSG this is a simple “elegant” immediate
beginning. I’m guessing

it will appeal to the researchers and educators on this
distinguished list.

Thank you both for a real step forward.

Alice

Alice Powers McElhone

73 Essex Avenue #6

Bloomfield, NJ 07003

apmce@benchpress.com.

From: Richard Marken rsmarken@gmail.com

To: Alison Powers
controlsystemsgroupconference@gmail.com

Cc: Alice McElhone apmcelhone@aol.com;
bbabbott@frontier.com

bbabbott@frontier.com; Dag Forssell
dag@livingcontrolsystems.com; Warren

Mansell wmansell@gmail.com; Sara Tai
sara.tai@manchester.ac.uk;

Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au;
mmt@mmtaylor.net

mmt@mmtaylor.net; Henry Yin hy43@duke.edu; Bill
Powers

powers_w@frontier.net; Bruce Nevin
bruce.nevin@gmail.com;

rjrobertson2@comcast.net rjrobertson2@comcast.net;
328babs .

bara0361@gmail.com; Denny Powers
denny68flh@gmail.com; McClelland, Kent

MCCLEL@grinnell.edu; Hugh Petrie
hgpetrie@acsu.buffalo.edu; Gary Cziko

gcziko@gmail.com; Control Systems Group Network
(CSGnet)

CSGNET@listserv.illinois.edu; Mike Mermel
mmermel@mikemermel.com; Autumn

Winter 1@aut.me; Richard Pfau
richardpfau4153@aol.com; isabel.adeyemi

isabel.adeyemi@manchester.ac.uk; sarah_alsawy
sarah_alsawy@live.co.uk;

heather.bell heather.bell@uleth.ca; alec.brady

alec.brady@behavioural.org.uk; emma.burns
emma.burns@police.govt.nz;

amnachoudry amnachoudry@hotmail.co.uk; janakacooray

janakacooray@gmail.com; farrell.pse
farrell.pse@gmail.com; emma.fowler-2

emma.fowler-2@student.manchester.ac.uk; hannah.gaffney

hannah.gaffney@manchester.ac.uk; davidgoldsteinphd

davidgoldsteinphd@gmail.com; dougal.hare
dougal.hare@manchester.ac.uk;

mail mail@nchawkes.com; cehalav cehalav@gmail.com;
kellyh82

kellyh82@live.co.uk; amy.jones-3
amy.jones-3@student.manchester.ac.uk;

4res4cp2mk 4res4cp2mk@gmail.com; devpriyak
devpriyak@gmail.com; d.laila

d.laila@soton.ac.uk; dunya.latif-aramesh

dunya.latif-aramesh@student.manchester.ac.uk;
kieranmatthijslord

kieranmatthijslord@hotmail.com; rsmarken
rsmarken@gmail.com; adam.matic

adam.matic@gmail.com; susan.mccormack47
susan.mccormack47@gmail.com;

davidwm40 davidwm40@hotmail.com; n.j.moberly
n.j.moberly@ex.ac.uk;

r.k.moore r.k.moore@dcs.shef.ac.uk; morris_lydia

morris_lydia@hotmail.com; richardmullan
richardmullan@mac.com;

elizabeth.murphy elizabeth.murphy@manchester.ac.uk;
g.niezen

g.niezen@swansea.ac.uk; rachel.oconnor

rachel.oconnor@student.manchester.ac.uk; irishi62305

irishi62305@yahoo.com; suzanna.parsons

suzanna.parsons@student.manchester.ac.uk; trishna.patel

trishna.patel@oxleas.nhs.uk; pellis pellis@uleth.ca;
fplooij

fplooij@kiddygroup.com; siddhi.poyarekar
siddhi.poyarekar@gmail.com; zr

zr@zinovi.net; kate.roughley
kate.roughley@manchester.ac.uk;

vaneeta.sadhnani vaneeta.sadhnani@nhs.net; oliver.s
oliver.s@telia.com;

rzspijk rzspijk@gmail.com; cmspratt
cmspratt@xalt.co.uk; agsteven

agsteven@stetson.edu; clairesti
clairesti@hotmail.co.uk; naomi.taylor

naomi.taylor@student.manchester.ac.uk; dougturk
dougturk@aol.com;

Filippo.Varese Filippo.Varese@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk;
guy.vernon

guy.vernon@student.manchester.ac.uk; jason
jason@jason-wright.com;

K.A.Wright K.A.Wright@ex.ac.uk; rupert
rupert@moonsit.co.uk

Sent: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 3:35 pm

Subject: Where we go from here with PCT

Dear all

I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as
everyone

else who I could think of who might have an interest in the future
of

PCT (this includes the many people listed on the public list of
PCT

researchers, students and practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site).
As

you know, Bill Powers passed away on May 24th. This was a great

personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as a father, brother
or

friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to those of
us

involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was
not

only the developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to
teach

his theory to others. Now those of us who recognize the
importance of

PCT and are excited about its future must carry on without
Bill’s

gentle but steady hand on the tiller, ready to right us when we
go

wrong (as he righted me when I so often went wrong).

So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future
of

PCT to suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one

suggestion from David Goldstein, which I think is a very good
one.

That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we
go

through Behavior: The Control of Perception, chapter by chapter
and

discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying
to

make, research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and
what

kinds of research is suggested by the points made in the
chapter.

David and I would be the “guides” in this course but there
will be no

“teacher”; all participants would be bother teachers and
students.

In order to make such a course work I think all those who would
like

to participate should be able to go to one place to have the

discussion. I think the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So
I

suggest that if you want to participate in the course (or just
listen

in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email
to:

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

The course could then just be a “thread” in the CSG
discussion.

If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together
for

such a course (and I’m sure there are better ideas; I’m pretty
old

fashioned when it comes to the internet) please feel free to let
me

know.

What I like about David’s idea for a course on B:CP is that it
honors

Bill’s most important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that
are

PCT). I also like it because it gets all of us who are working on
PCT

together so that we can keep each other “honest” as we go
about our

business of extending that legacy (Bill was very big on
subjecting

one’s own ideas to critical – and, of course, empirical–
test;

especially the ideas that you are most in love with).

So that’s my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many
of you

will get involved in this “course”. The future of PCT
depends on us

(and especially you younger folks).

Best regards

Rick

Richard S. Marken PhD

rsmarken@gmail.com


www.mindreadings.com

Richard S. Marken PhD

rsmarken@gmail.com


www.mindreadings.com

Post from Bruce Nevin in reply to Rick:

(Bruce writing from an airport on the way home)

···

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Alice McElhone > apmcelhone@aol.com wrote:

-----Original Message-----

Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

From: Bruce Nevin bruce.nevin@gmail.com

To: Richard Marken rsmarken@gmail.com

A searchable copy of B:CP alone is worth the price of
admission. Access can be restricted, if that’s desirable. Dag has found
that online availability hasn’t hurt sales, I think. His online pages are
watermarked, but they are available without restriction.

At 03:46 PM 6/10/2013, you wrote:

[From Dag Forssell (2013 18:15 PST]

In response to Bruce’s post, a clarification…

I have uploaded complete PDF files of the books I publish to my account
at Google Books, setting the read percentage to 100%. The books are
linked from my website.

The books are also featured at Look Inside at Amazon, but Amazon
restricts reading to 20% regardless of my 100% setting, making it
impossible to read on line there.

The text is not watermarked at Google Books, but slightly fuzzy. Google’s
controls allow you to zoom in at will. You flip pages at your leisure.
Text is searchable, except where it consists of images, which applies to
the letters in Dialogue…

I want to make the books available to students around the world. Teachers
such as Warren Mansell and Kent McClelland can assign chapters as course
reading without compelling their students to spend their limited
funds.

I figure business managers and others who catch on to PCT will purchase
printed books for easy reading. My sales are modest in any case.

Best, Dag

Where is the online version?

Fred Nickols

···

From: Dag Forssell [mailto:csgarchive@PCTRESOURCES.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:04 PM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Post from Bruce Nevin in reply to Rick:
(Bruce writing from an airport on the way home)

Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT
From: Bruce Nevin bruce.nevin@gmail.com
To: Richard Marken rsmarken@gmail.com

A searchable copy of B:CP alone is worth the price of admission. Access can be restricted, if that’s desirable. Dag has found that online availability hasn’t hurt sales, I think. His online pages are watermarked, but they are available without restriction.

At 03:46 PM 6/10/2013, you wrote:

Hi Alice et al

OK, I’ve already gotten “buy in” from several people, most of whom are
already on CSGNet. So apparently there is some interest in the class.
And there didn’t seem to be any protest about using CSGNet. So here’s
what I propose for now. I will start working with David Goldstein on a
syllabus and some materials for the class. I would like to shoot for
starting the class in the beginning of July. If you want to “enroll”
in the class, just subscribe to CSGNet using the simple procedure I
described in my original post in this thread. Just sent an email to

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with the words

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

in the body of the email.

Once you subscribe, you will start getting posts from the listserver
when people post things. If you are not interested in these posts
simply delete them. When the course starts you will receive posts that
start with “B:CP Course” or “Re: B:CP Course”. These will be the posts
relevant to the course. When the course starts you can either just
read those posts or comment on them using “Reply”, in which case the
post will be distributed to everyone in the course with the “Re:
BCP:Course” in the subject line.

So I envision the course being made up of a series “threads” defined
by the subject line in the email, but all subject lines will start
with “B:CP Course” or “Re: B:CP Course”. For example, the thread
titles would be something like:

B:CP Course: Preface
B:CP Course: Chapter 1, The Dilemmas of Behaviorism
B:CP: Course: Chapter 2, Models and Generalizations
.
.
B:CP: Course: Chapter 18, Conflict and Control
B:CP Course :Appendix : Control System Operation and Stability

The text for the course could be either the 1973 or (preferably) the
2005 edition of B:CP. If the chapter names are use the people using
the 1973 edition would have no problem following along, except they
would be missing the important Emotion chapter that was not included
in the 1973 edition.

One last thing. Warren Mansell asked whether, at the end of each
chapter’s discussion, a text version of the chapter be annotated with
links and consensual comments to act as a more concise archive than
the discussion itself. I would be willing to consider this if we can
get an electronic version of the text and that’s something that Alice
would have to have a say in. I think Alice would have to be willing to
put a an electronic version of the text up on the net. If so, then
we’ll try to include this in the course.

So there is no need to contact me any more to tell me that you want to
take the B:CP Course.

If you want to take the course, just SIGN UP FOR CSGNet and wait for
the posts headed “B:CP Course”, which should start coming in July.

Best regards

Rick

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Alice McElhone apmcelhone@aol.com wrote:

David and Rick:

I’m in! (I’ll figure out how to change my e-address on the CSGlist when I
get home.)

This is brilliant! Of all the ideas I’ve thought and heard about the future
of PDT and CSG this is a simple “elegant” immediate beginning. I’m guessing
it will appeal to the researchers and educators on this distinguished list.

Thank you both for a real step forward.

Alice

Alice Powers McElhone
73 Essex Avenue #6
Bloomfield, NJ 07003
apmce@benchpress.com.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Marken rsmarken@gmail.com
To: Alison Powers controlsystemsgroupconference@gmail.com
Cc: Alice McElhone apmcelhone@aol.com; bbabbott@frontier.com
bbabbott@frontier.com; Dag Forssell dag@livingcontrolsystems.com; Warren
Mansell wmansell@gmail.com; Sara Tai sara.tai@manchester.ac.uk;
Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au Tim.Carey@flinders.edu.au; mmt@mmtaylor.net
mmt@mmtaylor.net; Henry Yin hy43@duke.edu; Bill Powers
powers_w@frontier.net; Bruce Nevin bruce.nevin@gmail.com;
rjrobertson2@comcast.net rjrobertson2@comcast.net; 328babs .
bara0361@gmail.com; Denny Powers denny68flh@gmail.com; McClelland, Kent
MCCLEL@grinnell.edu; Hugh Petrie hgpetrie@acsu.buffalo.edu; Gary Cziko
gcziko@gmail.com; Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)
CSGNET@listserv.illinois.edu; Mike Mermel mmermel@mikemermel.com; Autumn
Winter 1@aut.me; Richard Pfau richardpfau4153@aol.com; isabel.adeyemi
isabel.adeyemi@manchester.ac.uk; sarah_alsawy sarah_alsawy@live.co.uk;
heather.bell heather.bell@uleth.ca; alec.brady
alec.brady@behavioural.org.uk; emma.burns emma.burns@police.govt.nz;
amnachoudry amnachoudry@hotmail.co.uk; janakacooray
janakacooray@gmail.com; farrell.pse farrell.pse@gmail.com; emma.fowler-2
emma.fowler-2@student.manchester.ac.uk; hannah.gaffney
hannah.gaffney@manchester.ac.uk; davidgoldsteinphd
davidgoldsteinphd@gmail.com; dougal.hare dougal.hare@manchester.ac.uk;
mail mail@nchawkes.com; cehalav cehalav@gmail.com; kellyh82
kellyh82@live.co.uk; amy.jones-3 amy.jones-3@student.manchester.ac.uk;
4res4cp2mk 4res4cp2mk@gmail.com; devpriyak devpriyak@gmail.com; d.laila
d.laila@soton.ac.uk; dunya.latif-aramesh
dunya.latif-aramesh@student.manchester.ac.uk; kieranmatthijslord
kieranmatthijslord@hotmail.com; rsmarken rsmarken@gmail.com; adam.matic
adam.matic@gmail.com; susan.mccormack47 susan.mccormack47@gmail.com;
davidwm40 davidwm40@hotmail.com; n.j.moberly n.j.moberly@ex.ac.uk;
r.k.moore r.k.moore@dcs.shef.ac.uk; morris_lydia
morris_lydia@hotmail.com; richardmullan richardmullan@mac.com;
elizabeth.murphy elizabeth.murphy@manchester.ac.uk; g.niezen
g.niezen@swansea.ac.uk; rachel.oconnor
rachel.oconnor@student.manchester.ac.uk; irishi62305
irishi62305@yahoo.com; suzanna.parsons
suzanna.parsons@student.manchester.ac.uk; trishna.patel
trishna.patel@oxleas.nhs.uk; pellis pellis@uleth.ca; fplooij
fplooij@kiddygroup.com; siddhi.poyarekar siddhi.poyarekar@gmail.com; zr
zr@zinovi.net; kate.roughley kate.roughley@manchester.ac.uk;
vaneeta.sadhnani vaneeta.sadhnani@nhs.net; oliver.s oliver.s@telia.com;
rzspijk rzspijk@gmail.com; cmspratt cmspratt@xalt.co.uk; agsteven
agsteven@stetson.edu; clairesti clairesti@hotmail.co.uk; naomi.taylor
naomi.taylor@student.manchester.ac.uk; dougturk dougturk@aol.com;
Filippo.Varese Filippo.Varese@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk; guy.vernon
guy.vernon@student.manchester.ac.uk; jason jason@jason-wright.com;
K.A.Wright K.A.Wright@ex.ac.uk; rupert rupert@moonsit.co.uk
Sent: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 3:35 pm
Subject: Where we go from here with PCT

Dear all

I am sending this to Bill Powers family, CSGList as well as everyone
else who I could think of who might have an interest in the future of
PCT (this includes the many people listed on the public list of PCT
researchers, students and practitioners at the PCTWeb.org site). As
you know, Bill Powers passed away on May 24th. This was a great
personal loss to many of us who knew Bill as a father, brother or
friend. But it was also a great intellectual loss to those of us
involved in research and/or application based on PCT. Bill was not
only the developer of PCT but he also had a unique ability to teach
his theory to others. Now those of us who recognize the importance of
PCT and are excited about its future must carry on without Bill’s
gentle but steady hand on the tiller, ready to right us when we go
wrong (as he righted me when I so often went wrong).

So I am writing to those of you who have an interest in the future of
PCT to suggest how we might best proceed. I already have one
suggestion from David Goldstein, which I think is a very good one.
That is, that we conduct something like an on-line course where we go
through Behavior: The Control of Perception, chapter by chapter and
discuss each chapter in terms of the main points Bill was trying to
make, research, old and new, that is relevant to those points and what
kinds of research is suggested by the points made in the chapter.
David and I would be the “guides” in this course but there will be no
“teacher”; all participants would be bother teachers and students.

In order to make such a course work I think all those who would like
to participate should be able to go to one place to have the
discussion. I think the best place to to this would be CSGNet. So I
suggest that if you want to participate in the course (or just listen
in) you should join the CSGNet listserve by sending an email to:

LISTSERV@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

with just the following text in the email:

SUBSCRIBE CSGNET

The course could then just be a “thread” in the CSG discussion.

If anyone has a better idea about how to get everyone together for
such a course (and I’m sure there are better ideas; I’m pretty old
fashioned when it comes to the internet) please feel free to let me
know.

What I like about David’s idea for a course on B:CP is that it honors
Bill’s most important legacy (the whole edifice of ideas that are
PCT). I also like it because it gets all of us who are working on PCT
together so that we can keep each other “honest” as we go about our
business of extending that legacy (Bill was very big on subjecting
one’s own ideas to critical – and, of course, empirical-- test;
especially the ideas that you are most in love with).

So that’s my proposal for the near future, anyway. I hope many of you
will get involved in this “course”. The future of PCT depends on us
(and especially you younger folks).

Best regards

Rick

Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com


Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com

from Dick Robertson, [2013,06,11,0935CDT]

This sounds like a great idea for exploring how well PCT ers agree on understanding of Bill's theory, and hopefully the extensions into further developments of theory and applications.

However, while this seems a good method of keeping up the connections between those already committed to the greatest behavior paragdigm revolution since 1650, it doesn't at all deal with how Bill's ideas can be spread to the wider lay community that might be interested. I'm speaking more specifically than just a pious wish that we will "go unto all the world" with the PCT message. I already know a couple of people to whom i've touted PCT, one has a Ph D in geology, is very bright and interested in behavior and all the sciences in general. She is a business partner and (almost) fiancee of my son Stuart, where they publish a bi-weekly newsleter on gemology. "No relation to behavior," you say. True, but they write to a mass audinece and have stated they want to edit an applied PCT behavioral self help book I wrote some years ago for my students. They say, PCT will impress more lay people, if presented in the layman's style, than the contemporary psychology who have an outmoded paradigm to protect in the manner forecast by PCT. How many other approaches to the lay world are there out there?

Dick Robertson

···

________________________________________
From: Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet) [CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU] On Behalf Of Fred Nickols [fred@NICKOLS.US]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 6:06 AM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Where is the online version?

Fred Nickols

From: Dag Forssell [mailto:csgarchive@PCTRESOURCES.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:04 PM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Post from Bruce Nevin in reply to Rick:
(Bruce writing from an airport on the way home)

Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT
From: Bruce Nevin <bruce.nevin@gmail.com<mailto:bruce.nevin@gmail.com>>
To: Richard Marken <rsmarken@gmail.com<mailto:rsmarken@gmail.com>>

A searchable copy of B:CP alone is worth the price of admission. Access can be restricted, if that's desirable. Dag has found that online availability hasn't hurt sales, I think. His online pages are watermarked, but they are available without restriction.

from Fred Nickols (2013.06.11.1058 EDT)

One other venue would be management, specifically, performance management
and HR in general.

Fred Nickols

From: Robertson Richard [mailto:R-Robertson@NEIU.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:48 AM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

From Dick Robertson, [2013,06,11,0935CDT]

This sounds like a great idea for exploring how well PCT ers agree on
understanding of Bill's theory, and hopefully the extensions into further
developments of theory and applications.

However, while this seems a good method of keeping up the connections
between those already committed to the greatest behavior paragdigm
revolution since 1650, it doesn't at all deal with how Bill's ideas can be

spread

to the wider lay community that might be interested. I'm speaking more
specifically than just a pious wish that we will "go unto all the world"

with the

PCT message. I already know a couple of people to whom i've touted PCT,
one has a Ph D in geology, is very bright and interested in behavior and

all the

sciences in general. She is a business partner and (almost) fiancee of my

son

Stuart, where they publish a bi-weekly newsleter on gemology. "No relation
to behavior," you say. True, but they write to a mass audinece and have
stated they want to edit an applied PCT behavioral self help book I wrote
some years ago for my students. They say, PCT will impress more lay

people,

if presented in the layman's style, than the contemporary psychology who
have an outmoded paradigm to protect in the manner forecast by PCT. How
many other approaches to the lay world are there out there?

Dick Robertson
________________________________________
From: Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)
[CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU] On Behalf Of Fred Nickols
[fred@NICKOLS.US]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 6:06 AM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Where is the online version?

Fred Nickols

From: Dag Forssell [mailto:csgarchive@PCTRESOURCES.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:04 PM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Post from Bruce Nevin in reply to Rick:
(Bruce writing from an airport on the way home)

Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT
From: Bruce Nevin
<bruce.nevin@gmail.com<mailto:bruce.nevin@gmail.com>>
To: Richard Marken <rsmarken@gmail.com<mailto:rsmarken@gmail.com>>

A searchable copy of B:CP alone is worth the price of admission. Access

can

be restricted, if that's desirable. Dag has found that online availability

hasn't

hurt sales, I think. His online pages are watermarked, but they are

available

···

-----Original Message-----
without restriction.

from Fred Nickols (2013.06.11.1107 EDT)

Dick:

I'd be very interested if you and or your publishing friend could take a
look at the one-pager at the following link and let me know if you think
it's written for lay people.

http://www.nickols.us/PCT101Primer.pdf

Fred Nickols

From: Robertson Richard [mailto:R-Robertson@NEIU.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:48 AM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

From Dick Robertson, [2013,06,11,0935CDT]

This sounds like a great idea for exploring how well PCT ers agree on
understanding of Bill's theory, and hopefully the extensions into further
developments of theory and applications.

However, while this seems a good method of keeping up the connections
between those already committed to the greatest behavior paragdigm
revolution since 1650, it doesn't at all deal with how Bill's ideas can be

spread

to the wider lay community that might be interested. I'm speaking more
specifically than just a pious wish that we will "go unto all the world"

with the

PCT message. I already know a couple of people to whom i've touted PCT,
one has a Ph D in geology, is very bright and interested in behavior and

all the

sciences in general. She is a business partner and (almost) fiancee of my

son

Stuart, where they publish a bi-weekly newsleter on gemology. "No relation
to behavior," you say. True, but they write to a mass audinece and have
stated they want to edit an applied PCT behavioral self help book I wrote
some years ago for my students. They say, PCT will impress more lay

people,

if presented in the layman's style, than the contemporary psychology who
have an outmoded paradigm to protect in the manner forecast by PCT. How
many other approaches to the lay world are there out there?

Dick Robertson
________________________________________
From: Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)
[CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU] On Behalf Of Fred Nickols
[fred@NICKOLS.US]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 6:06 AM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Where is the online version?

Fred Nickols

From: Dag Forssell [mailto:csgarchive@PCTRESOURCES.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:04 PM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Post from Bruce Nevin in reply to Rick:
(Bruce writing from an airport on the way home)

Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT
From: Bruce Nevin
<bruce.nevin@gmail.com<mailto:bruce.nevin@gmail.com>>
To: Richard Marken <rsmarken@gmail.com<mailto:rsmarken@gmail.com>>

A searchable copy of B:CP alone is worth the price of admission. Access

can

be restricted, if that's desirable. Dag has found that online availability

hasn't

hurt sales, I think. His online pages are watermarked, but they are

available

···

-----Original Message-----
without restriction.

[From Kent McClelland (2013.06.11.1005 CDT)

Dick Robertson, [2013,06,11,0935CDT]

Hi Dick,

I'm currently putting finishing touches on a proposal for a book (with the working title, "Stability") which will be based on PCT. My goal is to write the book in an accessible style that can speak to a wider audience than just sociologists.

If you're interested, I could send you a copy of the proposal, once I finish the next draft.

Kent

···

On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Fred Nickols wrote:

From Fred Nickols (2013.06.11.1058 EDT)

One other venue would be management, specifically, performance management
and HR in general.

Fred Nickols

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson Richard [mailto:R-Robertson@NEIU.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:48 AM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

From Dick Robertson, [2013,06,11,0935CDT]

This sounds like a great idea for exploring how well PCT ers agree on
understanding of Bill's theory, and hopefully the extensions into further
developments of theory and applications.

However, while this seems a good method of keeping up the connections
between those already committed to the greatest behavior paragdigm
revolution since 1650, it doesn't at all deal with how Bill's ideas can be

spread

to the wider lay community that might be interested. I'm speaking more
specifically than just a pious wish that we will "go unto all the world"

with the

PCT message. I already know a couple of people to whom i've touted PCT,
one has a Ph D in geology, is very bright and interested in behavior and

all the

sciences in general. She is a business partner and (almost) fiancee of my

son

Stuart, where they publish a bi-weekly newsleter on gemology. "No relation
to behavior," you say. True, but they write to a mass audinece and have
stated they want to edit an applied PCT behavioral self help book I wrote
some years ago for my students. They say, PCT will impress more lay

people,

if presented in the layman's style, than the contemporary psychology who
have an outmoded paradigm to protect in the manner forecast by PCT. How
many other approaches to the lay world are there out there?

Dick Robertson
________________________________________
From: Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)
[CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU] On Behalf Of Fred Nickols
[fred@NICKOLS.US]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 6:06 AM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Where is the online version?

Fred Nickols

From: Dag Forssell [mailto:csgarchive@PCTRESOURCES.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:04 PM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Post from Bruce Nevin in reply to Rick:
(Bruce writing from an airport on the way home)

Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT
From: Bruce Nevin
<bruce.nevin@gmail.com<mailto:bruce.nevin@gmail.com>>
To: Richard Marken <rsmarken@gmail.com<mailto:rsmarken@gmail.com>>

A searchable copy of B:CP alone is worth the price of admission. Access

can

be restricted, if that's desirable. Dag has found that online availability

hasn't

hurt sales, I think. His online pages are watermarked, but they are

available

without restriction.

Ref: Dick Robertson, [2013,06,11,0935CDT]

Dick,

For what it's worth, I'm putting finishing touches on a book for educated laypeople as well as psychologists and other professionals in which PCT is an integral part.

The draft should be finished by the end of the year and focuses on understanding why we do the things we do. At some point I'll request some PCT scholars to have a look to ensure that it is on target as far as PCT theory is concerned. It pulls together concepts from psychology, sociology, biology, philosophy, cybernetics, ... and, of course, PCT. I've been working on it for the last 10 years.

With Regards,
Richard Pfau

···

From: Richard Pfau [2013.06.11 2122 EDT]

Richard, this is great news! I hope to get a copy when it’s published.

I wanted to apologize for not being able to Skype with you last weekend during Dad’s memorial. I wasn’t as prepared as I would have like to have been, and we had only limited success making that connection. Thank you for making the effort to try to join us. I hope to meet you at a future conference.

*barb

(Bill’s daughter)

···

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Richard H. Pfau richardpfau4153@aol.com wrote:

From: Richard Pfau [2013.06.11 2122 EDT]

Ref: Dick Robertson, [2013,06,11,0935CDT]

Dick,

For what it’s worth, I’m putting finishing touches on a book for educated laypeople as well as psychologists and other professionals in which PCT is an integral part.

The draft should be finished by the end of the year and focuses on understanding why we do the things we do. At some point I’ll request some PCT scholars to have a look to ensure that it is on target as far as PCT theory is concerned. It pulls together concepts from psychology, sociology, biology, philosophy, cybernetics, … and, of course, PCT. I’ve been working on it for the last 10 years.

With Regards,

Richard Pfau

Dear Dick,

Long time, no see.

I assume you are familiar with our parenting book "The Wonder Weeks" (see www.thewonderweeks.com ) on baby development, but then you might not be. Since last year, we have managed to get sales (both printed books, as well as ebooks and chapter-ebooks) up to 3750 per month in the English speaking world through an intensive marketing campaign and numbers are still going up. In the book it is mentioned upfront that the book is based on PCT and a link is given to Dag's website.

Furthermore, with a management consultant I have written a book on reorganization in people who go through a crisis in their lives/careers. It is only in Dutch, though. It is written in normal language and not in scientific jargon.

Hope to see you in the not too distant future.
Warm regards,
Frans

···

******************
Dr. Frans X. Plooij
Director
International Research-institute on Infant Studies (IRIS)
Zijpendaalseweg 73
6814 CE Arnhem
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 460 888 20
Email: fplooij@kiddygroup.com
Tel.: +31 26 389 4841
Fax: +31 26 389 4493

Op 11 jun. 2013, om 16:48 heeft Robertson Richard <R-Robertson@neiu.edu> het volgende geschreven:

From Dick Robertson, [2013,06,11,0935CDT]

This sounds like a great idea for exploring how well PCT ers agree on understanding of Bill's theory, and hopefully the extensions into further developments of theory and applications.

However, while this seems a good method of keeping up the connections between those already committed to the greatest behavior paragdigm revolution since 1650, it doesn't at all deal with how Bill's ideas can be spread to the wider lay community that might be interested. I'm speaking more specifically than just a pious wish that we will "go unto all the world" with the PCT message. I already know a couple of people to whom i've touted PCT, one has a Ph D in geology, is very bright and interested in behavior and all the sciences in general. She is a business partner and (almost) fiancee of my son Stuart, where they publish a bi-weekly newsleter on gemology. "No relation to behavior," you say. True, but they write to a mass audinece and have stated they want to edit an applied PCT behavioral self help book I wrote some years ago for my students. They say, PCT will impress more lay people, if presented in the layman's style, than the contemporary psychology who have an outmoded paradigm to protect in the manner forecast by PCT. How many other approaches to the lay world are there out there?

Dick Robertson
________________________________________
From: Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet) [CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU] On Behalf Of Fred Nickols [fred@NICKOLS.US]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 6:06 AM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Where is the online version?

Fred Nickols

From: Dag Forssell [mailto:csgarchive@PCTRESOURCES.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:04 PM
To: CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT

Post from Bruce Nevin in reply to Rick:
(Bruce writing from an airport on the way home)

Subject: Re: Where we go from here with PCT
From: Bruce Nevin <bruce.nevin@gmail.com<mailto:bruce.nevin@gmail.com>>
To: Richard Marken <rsmarken@gmail.com<mailto:rsmarken@gmail.com>>

A searchable copy of B:CP alone is worth the price of admission. Access can be restricted, if that's desirable. Dag has found that online availability hasn't hurt sales, I think. His online pages are watermarked, but they are available without restriction.

[From Erling Jorgensen (2013.06.13 1530 EST)]

Frans Plooij (Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:49:28 +0200)

Hello Frans,
I have admired your work for a long time, ever since I first read it
in the American Behavioral Scientist. Tremendously insightful, to
combine awareness of the differential time signatures of various
hierarchical PCT levels of perception with the ethological observations
you & Hetty were making of chimpanzee development.

And then to see you transfer the work & apply the insights to human
infant development, in a very accessible way to new parents. As you
reference:

I assume you are familiar with our parenting book "The Wonder Weeks"
(see www.thewonderweeks.com ) on baby development... In the book it is
mentioned upfront that the book is based on PCT and a link is given to
Dag's website.

For what it is worth, I have given the book several times as gifts to
new mothers among my colleagues at the mental health center where I work.
I have heard very favorable responses from them, that it provided a map
of what their baby was going through, & much reassurance about those
fussy developmental periods of reorganization. Very helpful.

Furthermore, with a management consultant I have written a book on
reorganization in people who go through a crisis in their lives/careers.
It is only in Dutch, though. It is written in normal language and not in
scientific jargon.

I'm sure I join others in hoping that this may be translated into English
in the near future. Looking forward to that!

All the best,
Erling

Dear Erling,

thank you for your compliments. We are looking into the possibility of getting that management book published in English.
As soon as that is going to happen, I will communicate it on the CSGnet.

Best Wishes,
Frans

···

******************
Dr. Frans X. Plooij
Director
International Research-institute on Infant Studies (IRIS)
Zijpendaalseweg 73
6814 CE Arnhem
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 460 888 20
Email: fplooij@kiddygroup.com
Tel.: +31 26 389 4841
Fax: +31 26 389 4493

Op 13 jun. 2013, om 21:54 heeft Erling Jorgensen <ejorgensen@RIVERBENDCMHC.ORG> het volgende geschreven:

[From Erling Jorgensen (2013.06.13 1530 EST)]

Frans Plooij (Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:49:28 +0200)

Hello Frans,
I have admired your work for a long time, ever since I first read it
in the American Behavioral Scientist. Tremendously insightful, to
combine awareness of the differential time signatures of various
hierarchical PCT levels of perception with the ethological observations
you & Hetty were making of chimpanzee development.

And then to see you transfer the work & apply the insights to human
infant development, in a very accessible way to new parents. As you
reference:

I assume you are familiar with our parenting book "The Wonder Weeks"
(see www.thewonderweeks.com ) on baby development... In the book it is
mentioned upfront that the book is based on PCT and a link is given to
Dag's website.

For what it is worth, I have given the book several times as gifts to
new mothers among my colleagues at the mental health center where I work.
I have heard very favorable responses from them, that it provided a map
of what their baby was going through, & much reassurance about those
fussy developmental periods of reorganization. Very helpful.

Furthermore, with a management consultant I have written a book on
reorganization in people who go through a crisis in their lives/careers.
It is only in Dutch, though. It is written in normal language and not in
scientific jargon.

I'm sure I join others in hoping that this may be translated into English
in the near future. Looking forward to that!

All the best,
Erling