CSGnet: see last couple of paragraphs.
Here is the link to Richard's article:
http://www2.cmp.uea.ac.uk/~jrk/temp/RK-20120430-causnoncorr.pdf
Hello, Richard --
Once again I am staggered by your ability to make yourself
understood. By rights I should not have understood a word of what you
wrote to your mathematical peers, but your meanings always shimmered
visibly just beneath the surface, and at times were crystal clear.
How do you do that?
A couple of random comments which may or may not correlate with anything.
First, to a control system there is no such thing as noise. There are
just variables that vary, sometimes too fast to keep up with and
sometimes in ways that allow maintaining good control. The control
system doesn't know or care about waveforms so either everything
looks random or nothing does. Noise is just a classification by an
observer of waveforms that he can't explain or predict in detail.
Second, causation is a meaningless term unless you simply mean that B
is a particular known function of A. As most people use the term,
causation is magic: B varies simply because A varied, and not because
of any intervening connection between them. The wizard waves his wand
(A) and causes the castle to disappear (B). The way statistics is
used in the life sciences mostly guarantees that causation is
magical: there is no attempt to analyze the situation and work out
what mechanisms are behind apparent causation. The whole point of
statistics is to find causation where you have no idea of the
mechanisms. If you knew the mechanisms, you wouldn't need the
statistics. As you show in your writings here, if you just know the
statistics, you don't know anything about the mechanisms, either.
Drop the idea of causation and those problems disappear, don't they?
By the way, Allie and I would both sort of like to know if anyone
other than the two who have sent their conference fees already is
coming to the July CSG meeting. Before long we are going to have to
make some payments to reserve space and time, and the plan was to use
the conference fees for that. We have received five descriptions of
what some people wish to present, which is already more than the
number registering to attend, so I am having trouble seeing how that
is going to work. And even with five presenters and five days to do
the presenting, the schedule is not going to be very crowded and we
won't need a big conference room.
I'm blind-copying this to CSGnet to catch other people who might
come. Various useful documents are attached. I am going to start nagging.
Best,
Bill P.
CallForPapers2012A1.doc (26.5 KB)
CSGRegistration2012FEB2.doc (74.5 KB)
CSGConferenceFlyer3-29-12.doc (19 KB)