ACT and MOL

Hello, all (for CSGnet: from Bill Powers 2011.03.30.0855 MDT) --

I got a reply from Steven Hayes which could be seen as discouraging.
His post wasn't as seemingly discouraging as the papers he sent me to
read (attached).
But make up your own minds. I will keep trying for one or two more rounds.

Best,

Bill

Deictics-Weil-PsychRecord–figures 1-3.doc (1 MB)

Deictics-Weil-PsychRecord 2 18 2010 submitted.doc (1.09 MB)

(Gavin Ritz 2011.03.31.10.55NZT)

Hello, all (for CSGnet: from Bill Powers 2011.03.30.0855 MDT)

This is why I think PCT is
on the right track.

It’s
the shape, hues and intensities of energy that we control biologically that
gives this false sense of something else called information
.

Even language is really a
control of hues and shapes and intensities of sight and sound energies. The
difference between a biological organism and dead matter is not information (so
famously touted by Richard Dawkins), but the
ability of a living organism to control its own energies.

No such thing as
information as being exchanged by living organisms.

PCT has an underlying fundamental
model that takes care of this problem, in fact that is a PCT answer to the information-biological
problem.

Regards

Gavin

I got a reply from Steven Hayes which could be seen as
discouraging.

His post wasn’t as seemingly discouraging as the
papers he sent me to

read (attached).

But make up your own minds. I will keep trying for one
or two more rounds.

Best,

Bill