Basic and Meta PCT -- A simple plea

[From Bruce Gregory (971202.1715 EST)]

Rick Marken (971202.1220)]

Why not try to stop setting me straight about stuff I've already
rejected and just reply to Bill Powers' (971202.0610 MST) very
interesting request:

> ...list the ideas in traditional psychology that in your view
> _are_ in conflict with PCT, that would need to be changed if PCT
> is valid. Are all the errors only errors of omission, as you
> have implied? Or are there any basic concepts that would have
> to be judged wrong if PCT is judged right?

Could someone send me a copy of Bill's post? I have yet to see
it. Thanks.