I thought I posted this at the time (the end of October!) but evidently I didn’t, and I see it was because I hadn’t answered as fully as I wanted.
Yes, the column heads name the essential elements — behavior (observed phenomena), CV, reference value, means, and disturbance. Specifying these with actionable precision becomes more difficult at higher levels — actionable either for experiment or for modeling. Under the means column, it is necessary to specify these essential elements at each successively lower level of control (presumably by reference to other rows of the table). Without that, we risk mere hand-waving. Or multiple instances of the CROWD program with the interpretive labels changed.
Many such perceptions are involved in diverse instances of the Matthew Effect. (I also referred to it here).