CSG International 2012 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE

From Bill and Allie P:

OK, everyone, Allie is working with people at the U of Colorado and
the Outlook Hotel to organize the conference schedule and we need
some input. Right now we need to categorize the sessions, probably by
day, and need ideas about what the major categories should be. When
you respond, preferably before Jan. 28, we'll issue a revised
schedule and a call for papers. You can consider any reference to
content for uncommitted times as suggestions only, and make your own
suggestions. Please, make the replies quick so we can issue the final
call for papers as early as possible. If you want to submit a paper
now, that will give us a head start.

The MOL workshop has been absorbed into the main CSG schedule,
because none of the most experienced clinicians in England and
Australia will be able to attend in person. On the schedule for
Friday, July 20, you'll see that there are two uncommitted sessions
at the Outlook Hotel in the morning, then after lunch at CU (the U of
Colorado at Boulder), afternoon sessions on MOL including
teleconferencing with Tim Carey in Alice Springs, Australia, and
Warren Mansell and Sara Tai in Manchester, England. These sessions
are planned for the 400-seat auditorium in the Muenzinger building,
and we want to invite the clinical psych people at CU and perhaps
even local psychotherapists to attend. By starting the teleconference
at 1:30 PM (13:30) we make Tim Carey be ready at 5:00 AM his time,
and Warren and Sara have to wait until 8:30 PM (20:30) their time,
but all three locations can be joined in one teleconference. Yes, the
time zone in Alice Springs is displaced by half an hour and they will
not be on Daylight Saving Time.

The sessions are defined as 20 or 30 minute presentations with the
same length of discussion time for each. The shorter presentations
let us squeeze in a few more presenters. Each presenter can trade off
discussion time against presentation time, though we strongly
recommend a 50-50 split.

To make the discussions more pertinent, we also request that each
presenter supply a printable version of the talk (a .doc file is
fine) which can be duplicated and handed out on the first evening,
Tuesday, or even made available via internet earlier than that. With
the paper having being read in advance, a presentation could, in the
extreme, consist of "Are there any questions?". It is also possible
for non-presenters to distribute papers at the meeting and reference
them as having been presented at the CSG International 2012 meeting.

You'll notice that the meeting is one day longer than the traditional
meetings have been. Arrival day is Tuesday instead of Wednesday which
means Wednesday will be a full day of sessions.

Allie is still working out tradeoffs on the costs. They will probably
be higher than last year, but not too much higher since CU is helping
out with some facilities such as less-expensive bus service and a
meeting room for some sessions. The hotel room discount will be less,
but charges for meeting rooms at the Outlook will also be less -- we
just have to wait and see how that works out.

Please offer your suggestions for categories as soon as you can so we
can issue the call for papers by next week.

Best,

Bill P.

Schedule20121-24-12.doc (30.5 KB)

[From Richard Pfau (2012:01.24 1515EST)

Bill,

I don’t know if this may lead to a possible category at the conference such as “Behavior Change” or “Changing Behaviour”, but I would like to let you know that I am thinking of presenting a paper along the lines of “Using PCT as a Framework for Behavior Change”.

With Regards,

Richard Pfau

···

-----Original Message-----

From: Bill Powers powers_w@FRONTIER.NET

To: CSGNET CSGNET@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU

Sent: Tue, Jan 24, 2012 12:19 pm

Subject: CSG International 2012 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE

` From Bill and Allie P:

OK, everyone, Allie is working with people at the U of Colorado and

the Outlook Hotel to organize the conference schedule and we need

some input. Right now we need to categorize the sessions, probably by

day, and need ideas about what the major categories should be. When

you respond, preferably before Jan. 28, we'll issue a revised

schedule and a call for papers. You can consider any reference to

content for uncommitted times as suggestions only, and make your own

suggestions. Please, make the replies quick so we can issue the final

call for papers as early as possible. If you want to submit a paper

now, that will give us a head start.

The MOL workshop has been absorbed into the main CSG schedule,

because none of the most experienced clinicians in England and

Australia will be able to attend in person. On the schedule for

Friday, July 20, you'll see that there are two uncommitted sessions

at the Outlook Hotel in the morning, then after lunch at CU (the U of

Colorado at Boulder), afternoon sessions on MOL including

teleconferencing with Tim Carey in Alice Springs, Australia, and

Warren Mansell and Sara Tai in Manchester, England. These sessions

are planned for the 400-seat auditorium in the Muenzinger building,

and we want to invite the clinical psych people at CU and perhaps

even local psychotherapists to attend. By starting the teleconference

at 1:30 PM (13:30) we make Tim Carey be ready at 5:00 AM his time,

and Warren and Sara have to wait until 8:30 PM (20:30) their time,

but all three locations can be joined in one teleconference. Yes, the

time zone in Alice Springs is displaced by half an hour and they will

not be on Daylight Saving Time.

The sessions are defined as 20 or 30 minute presentations with the

same length of discussion time for each. The shorter presentations

let us squeeze in a few more presenters. Each presenter can trade off

discussion time against presentation time, though we strongly

recommend a 50-50 split.

To make the discussions more pertinent, we also request that each

presenter supply a printable version of the talk (a .doc file is

fine) which can be duplicated and handed out on the first evening,

Tuesday, or even made available via internet earlier than that. With

the paper having being read in advance, a presentation could, in the

extreme, consist of "Are there any questions?". It is also possible

for non-presenters to distribute papers at the meeting and reference

them as having been presented at the CSG International 2012 meeting.

You'll notice that the meeting is one day longer than the traditional

meetings have been. Arrival day is Tuesday instead of Wednesday which

means Wednesday will be a full day of sessions.

Allie is still working out tradeoffs on the costs. They will probably

be higher than last year, but not too much higher since CU is helping

out with some facilities such as less-expensive bus service and a

meeting room for some sessions. The hotel room discount will be less,

but charges for meeting rooms at the Outlook will also be less -- we

just have to wait and see how that works out.

Please offer your suggestions for categories as soon as you can so we

can issue the call for papers by next week.

Best,

Bill P.

`

[Matti Kolu (2012.01.26.0035 CET]]

[From Richard Pfau (2012:01.24 1515EST)
I don't know if this may lead to a possible category at the conference such

as "Behavior Change" or "Changing Behaviour", but I?would like to let you
know that I am thinking of presenting a paper along the lines of "Using PCT
as a Framework for Behavior Change".

At the risk of showcasing my ignorance: aren't the phrases "changing
behaviour" and "behavior change" if not incompatible with PCT, at least less
than appropriate as they take the external view of a (living) control system?

As an individual, you can't change your behavior because you don't control
your behavior. Not only don't you control your behavior -- it's impossible
for you to do so.

You can change which perceptual variables you choose to "control for". You
can -- by using your attention -- resolve conflicts between control systems
and you can also reorganize/develop new control systems. If you do any of
the aforementioned things, an outside observer might comment that your
behavior has changed. And while that is true, you as an individual did not
change your behavior.

Matti

···

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:15:20 -0500, Richard H. Pfau <richardpfau4153@AOL.COM> wrote:

[From Rick Marken (2012.01.25.1720)]

Matti Kolu (2012.01.26.0035 CET)

Richard Pfau (2012:01.24 1515EST)

RP: I don’t know if this may lead to a possible category at the conference such

as “Behavior Change” or “Changing Behaviour”, but I?would like to let you
know that I am thinking of presenting a paper along the lines of "Using PCT

as a Framework for Behavior Change".

MK: At the risk of showcasing my ignorance: aren’t the phrases "changing

behaviour" and “behavior change” if not incompatible with PCT, at least less

than appropriate as they take the external view of a (living) control system?

RM: Whoever you are Matti, you are right on target, so direct!

And a nice explanation of the PCT view. I’m sure this is what Richard means by “behavior change”. After all, PCT does say that behavior is the control of perception. So change in behavior must mean just what you say it does – a change in the perceptions you control. But someone unfamiliar with PCT would surely not understand it that way. But I bet their minds would be blown when they hear what Richard has to say about it.

Best

Rick

···

As an individual, you can’t change your behavior because you don’t control

your behavior. Not only don’t you control your behavior – it’s impossible

for you to do so.

You can change which perceptual variables you choose to “control for”. You

can – by using your attention – resolve conflicts between control systems

and you can also reorganize/develop new control systems. If you do any of

the aforementioned things, an outside observer might comment that your

behavior has changed. And while that is true, you as an individual did not

change your behavior.


Richard S. Marken PhD
rsmarken@gmail.com
www.mindreadings.com