From: Richard Pfau [mailto:richardhpfau@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:17 AM To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: Re: Effing control
Rupert,
This is a very nice, thought-provoking video. A good addition to the PCT instructional repertoire.
Any comments or suggestions welcome, which I might incorporate
into another version.
RM: Nicely done, Rupert! I am going to try to remember to point to it from my MindReadings site (in some very small circles that is considered an honor;-). The only thing I would suggest adding in the sequel is something about how control of perception is the only way to produce consistent results (like the “f”) under varying circumstances (like drawing it on different surface), where producing the same result must necessarily be done using different means that are appropriate to the different circumstances. A control of input architecture does this “automatically”.Â
Again, nicely done!
BestÂ
Mr. Knightly
– Regards,
Rupert
–
Richard S. MarkenÂ
"Perfection is achieved not when you have nothing more to add, but when you
have nothing left to take away.â?
                --Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Thanks, I am honoured! Though don't use this link, I'll post the
final one when done.
?
Rupert
···
RM: Nicely done, Rupert! I am going
to try to remember to point to it from my MindReadings site
(in some very small circles that is considered an honor;-).
The only thing I would suggest adding in the sequel is
something about how control of perception is the only way to
produce consistent results (like the “f”) under varying
circumstances (like drawing it on different surface), where
producing the same result must necessarily be done using
different means that are appropriate to the different
circumstances. A control of input architecture does this
“automatically”.
Here's the final version [https://youtu.be/fSH6OKS0dTM](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_fSH6OKS0dTM&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=t1Vt3TAzL1eLSHlvVqsq0xAPhGTNTh6nkY68EAlMR2U&s=jli8nNHxPYaxCt-EqR8Er7Lr_-cdMkEhsKtfqXYAv-o&e=)
I did re-film a few times with your addition but I wasn't happy with
the (inconsistent) results, so I’ve stuck with the previous version
for now. But have added your point to my notes.
Rupert
···
Rupert Young (2017.11.14 15.00)–
Here's a draft video I put together to demonstrate a
multitude of perceptions controlled to perform an
ordinary task.
Any comments or suggestions welcome, which I might
incorporate into another version.
RM: Nicely done, Rupert! I am going to try to remember
to point to it from my MindReadings site (in some very
small circles that is considered an honor;-). The only
thing I would suggest adding in the sequel is something
about how control of perception is the only way to produce
consistent results (like the “f”) under varying
circumstances (like drawing it on different surface),
where producing the same result must necessarily be done
using different means that are appropriate to the
different circumstances. A control of input architecture
does this “automatically”.