Irrationality

[From Bruce Gregory (2003.0323.1632)]

It seems to me that one of the hallmarks of irrationality is tunnel
vision. In the case of the Bush tax policy, for example, this amounts to
a relentless focus on reducing taxes with no evidence that appropriate
consideration is being given to a host of ancillary issues. In fact, the
President�s tax policy makes sense, i.e., does not lead to economic
ruin, in only one scenario: the money that would have gone into taxes is
invested in domestic production (even if higher returns could be
generated elsewhere) and this enhanced production leads to higher wages
that workers use to purchase a share of this domestic production at the
same time stock prices resume a sufficiently rapid growth that
government revenues increase substantially. Now gambling the Nation�s
economy on this particular outcome is at best imprudent, since there are
many equally plausible distinctly unpleasant outcomes of the tax cuts
such as a mounting national debt and skyrocketing interest rates that
push the economy into depression.

A second characteristic of irrationally is that when it is pointed out
to the person that they have failed to consider ancillary issues, their
response is to ignore the warning and deny the relevance of the other
issues or to attack the person issuing the warning. Once again this is
demonstrated in the case of the Bush tax policy.

Now comparing the Bush tax policy with the treatment of RTP may seem
nasty to some but, but the similarities are compelling to me. First the
tunnel vision focus on, �I see you have chosen�� Next the unwillingness
to see any virtues in Ed�s program or to suggest alternative approaches
to achieving Ed�s goals. Finally the ad hominem attacks on anyone who
does not agree with Bill and Rick on their interpretation of what is
happening in the classroom.

I do not expect to change anyone�s mind by this post. I offer it because
it exemplifies a breakdown in rational thinking that can lead in Bush�s
case to a global catastrophe (economic meltdown or nuclear war) and
CSGnet�s case to people leaving the discussion. If irrationality cannot
be discussed without rancor on CSGnet, what hope is there?

···

--
Bruce Gregory lives with the poet and painter Gray Jacobik in the future
Canadian Province of New England.

www.joincanadanow.org

[From Bill Powers (2003.03.23.1751 MSTY)]

Bruce Gregory (2003.0323.1632)--

>It seems to me that one of the hallmarks of irrationality is tunnel
>vision.

>First the tunnel vision focus on, "I see you have chosen".

Your broader vision says, as I understand it, that this is OK if your
motives are good -- if you're trying to teach a child to take
responsibility, for example. I disagree, for reasons I have tried to
explain. Does that make me like Bush?

>Next the unwillingness to see any virtues in Ed's program or to suggest
alternative >approaches to achieving Ed's goals.

Where on Earth did you get that idea? I have said that Ed's program appears
to be excellent and effective, and have recommended it to many people.
There are a few aspects of it that I would change to make it even better,
and I have said what they are and what I would recommend that teachers do
or stop doing. Your position seems to be that if any criticism of any
aspect of Ed's program whatsoever is offered, then the critic must be
totally against Ed, see nothing good in him or his program, and be out to
destroy RTP. That is a truly excessive reaction.

>Finally the ad hominem attacks on anyone who does not agree with Bill and
Rick on their >interpretation of what is happening in the classroom.

Greg, I haven't even tried an ad hominem attack. Ad hominem is saying that
anyone who disagrees with you must be irrational. If I subject you to an ad
hominem attack, believe me -- you'll know it.

Best,

Bill P.