myths article

[Avery Andrews 930123.1130]

Wobbly as my grasp & background may be, I do have some ideas about how
a feedback myths article might be organized, which go as follows:

  1. Some examples of egregious blunders (to get people to see quickly
        that there is a problem).

  2. The major myths & how they started.

  3. Some bad effects on current research.

  4. Some puzzles & anomalies that might be cleared up by the BCP approach.

Avery.Andrews@anu.edu.au

[From Oded Maler (930125)]

Re: Feedback too slow

I posted this inquiry to a realtively-prominent researcher in
motor control, and the following answer contains some references
that might be intersting.

···

--------------------------------------------

Secondly with regard to your question-
there is out from December the last issue on Current Contents
in Neurobiology-motor control
with reviews about role of feedback
(either by Hasan or Laquaniti I dont remember)
A couple of years ago there was also a review by Hasan and
Stewart in a book
in the series Excersise and Sport Science Reviews
(1988 or 1986 0r 1987).
It is generally a matter of debate- a lot of things can be
done without feedback.
Actually there is also a paper by Ghez in the
Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on the Brain (1990).

---------------------------------

Hope this helps

--Oded

--

Oded Maler, LGI-IMAG (Campus), B.P. 53x, 38041 Grenoble, France
Phone: 76635846 Fax: 76446675 e-mail: maler@vercors.imag.fr