New prosthetic arm controlled by neural messages

Could this even be done without (implicitly) employing PCT?

Ted

image00110.png

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

image0067.jpg

···

New prosthetic arm controlled by neural messages

Date:

August 6, 2014

Source:

Investigación y Desarrollo


http://images.sciencedaily.com/2014/08/140806094704-large.jpg

Prosthetic. This design aims to identify the memory of movement in the amputee’s brain in order to manipulate the device.

[Click to enlarge image]

A new design aims to identify the memory of movement in the amputee’s brain in order to manipulate the prosthetic device.

Controlling a prosthetic arm by just imagining a motion may be possible through the work of Mexican scientists at the Centre for Research and Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV), who work in the development of an arm replacement to identify movement patterns from brain signals.

First, it is necessary to know if there is a memory pattern to remember in the amputee’s brain in order to know how it moved and, thus, translating it to instructions for the prosthesis," says Roberto Muñoz Guerrero, researcher at the Department of Electrical Engineering and project leader at Cinvestav.

He explains that the electric signal won’t come from the muscles that form the stump, but from the movement patterns of the brain. “If this phase is successful, the patient would be able to move the prosthesis by imagining different movements.”

However, Muñoz Guerrero acknowledges this is not an easy task because the brain registers a wide range of activities that occur in the human body and from all of them, the movement pattern is tried to be drawn. “Therefore, the first step is to recall the patterns in the EEG and define there the memory that can be electrically recorded. Then we need to evaluate how sensitive the signal is to other external shocks, such as light or blinking.”

Regarding this, it should be noted that the prosthesis could only be used by individuals who once had their entire arm and was amputated because some accident or illness. Patients were able to move the arm naturally and stored in their memory the process that would apply for the use of the prosthesis.

According to the researcher, the prosthesis must be provided with a mechanical and electronic system, the elements necessary to activate it and a section that would interpret the brain signals. “Regarding the material with which it must be built, it has not yet been fully defined because it must weigh between two and three kilograms, which is similar to the missing arm’s weight.”

The unique prosthesis represents a new topic in bioelectronics called BCI (Brain Computer Interface), which is a direct communication pathway between the brain and an external device in order to help or repair sensory and motor functions. “An additional benefit is the ability to create motion paths for the prosthesis, which is not possible with commercial products,” says Muñoz Guerrero.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Investigación y Desarrollo. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


[From Rick Marken (2014.08.08.1230)]

image0067.jpg

image00110.png

···

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Ted Cloak tcloak@unm.edu wrote:

Could this even be done without (implicitly) employing PCT?

Ted

Sure they can do it; they are doing it. But it won’t work very well because it is based on the assumption that the brain controls output. In fact, the brain controls input (by varying output). So, since the person using the prosthesis doesn’t perceive (at least proprioceptively or kinesthetically) the results of whatever output signals the brain send to the prosthesis, the behavior produced by the prosthesis will not be very well organized.

A prosthesis that is built around an understanding of control of perception has already been created. The reference is at

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-sensorized-prosthetic-hand-20140204-story.html#axzz2sTjlxwzu

We already discussed on the net, I think. But the results are dramatically great and pretty much what would be expected based on PCT: When you give a person the ability to perceive the consequences of their actions that they want to control then they can control those consequences quite well, even when the actions are produced by a prosthetic device rather than their own muscles.

Best

Rick

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


New prosthetic arm controlled by neural messages

Date:

August 6, 2014

Source:

Investigación y Desarrollo


Prosthetic. This design aims to identify the memory of movement in the amputee’s brain in order to manipulate the device.

[Click to enlarge image]

A new design aims to identify the memory of movement in the amputee’s brain in order to manipulate the prosthetic device.

Controlling a prosthetic arm by just imagining a motion may be possible through the work of Mexican scientists at the Centre for Research and Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV), who work in the development of an arm replacement to identify movement patterns from brain signals.

First, it is necessary to know if there is a memory pattern to remember in the amputee’s brain in order to know how it moved and, thus, translating it to instructions for the prosthesis," says Roberto Muñoz Guerrero, researcher at the Department of Electrical Engineering and project leader at Cinvestav.

He explains that the electric signal won’t come from the muscles that form the stump, but from the movement patterns of the brain. “If this phase is successful, the patient would be able to move the prosthesis by imagining different movements.”

However, Muñoz Guerrero acknowledges this is not an easy task because the brain registers a wide range of activities that occur in the human body and from all of them, the movement pattern is tried to be drawn. “Therefore, the first step is to recall the patterns in the EEG and define there the memory that can be electrically recorded. Then we need to evaluate how sensitive the signal is to other external shocks, such as light or blinking.”

Regarding this, it should be noted that the prosthesis could only be used by individuals who once had their entire arm and was amputated because some accident or illness. Patients were able to move the arm naturally and stored in their memory the process that would apply for the use of the prosthesis.

According to the researcher, the prosthesis must be provided with a mechanical and electronic system, the elements necessary to activate it and a section that would interpret the brain signals. “Regarding the material with which it must be built, it has not yet been fully defined because it must weigh between two and three kilograms, which is similar to the missing arm’s weight.”

The unique prosthesis represents a new topic in bioelectronics called BCI (Brain Computer Interface), which is a direct communication pathway between the brain and an external device in order to help or repair sensory and motor functions. “An additional benefit is the ability to create motion paths for the prosthesis, which is not possible with commercial products,” says Muñoz Guerrero.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Investigación y Desarrollo. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.



Richard S. Marken, Ph.D.
Author of Doing Research on Purpose.
Now available from Amazon or Barnes & Noble

Thanks for that, Rick. The LA Times article, and the source article (attached) are crazy-making, because they don’t seem to realize what they’ve got. Over and over, they speak about how the subject (says he) feels different surfaces, downplaying or ignoring the fact that, feel or not, he controls that feedback to accomplish his intent!

image00110.png

image0067.jpg

Sci Transl Med-2014-Raspopovic-222ra19.pdf (1.86 MB)

···

From: csgnet-request@lists.illinois.edu [mailto:csgnet-request@lists.illinois.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Marken
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 1:34 PM
To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Cc: Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)
Subject: Re: New prosthetic arm controlled by neural messages

[From Rick Marken (2014.08.08.1230)]

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Ted Cloak tcloak@unm.edu wrote:

Could this even be done without (implicitly) employing PCT?

Ted

Sure they can do it; they are doing it. But it won’t work very well because it is based on the assumption that the brain controls output. In fact, the brain controls input (by varying output). So, since the person using the prosthesis doesn’t perceive (at least proprioceptively or kinesthetically) the results of whatever output signals the brain send to the prosthesis, the behavior produced by the prosthesis will not be very well organized.

A prosthesis that is built around an understanding of control of perception has already been created. The reference is at

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-sensorized-prosthetic-hand-20140204-story.html#axzz2sTjlxwzu

We already discussed on the net, I think. But the results are dramatically great and pretty much what would be expected based on PCT: When you give a person the ability to perceive the consequences of their actions that they want to control then they can control those consequences quite well, even when the actions are produced by a prosthetic device rather than their own muscles.

Best

Rick

ScienceDaily: Your source for the latest research news

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


New prosthetic arm controlled by neural messages

Date:

August 6, 2014

Source:

Investigación y Desarrollo


http://images.sciencedaily.com/2014/08/140806094704-large.jpg

Prosthetic. This design aims to identify the memory of movement in the amputee’s brain in order to manipulate the device.

[Click to enlarge image]

A new design aims to identify the memory of movement in the amputee’s brain in order to manipulate the prosthetic device.

Controlling a prosthetic arm by just imagining a motion may be possible through the work of Mexican scientists at the Centre for Research and Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV), who work in the development of an arm replacement to identify movement patterns from brain signals.

First, it is necessary to know if there is a memory pattern to remember in the amputee’s brain in order to know how it moved and, thus, translating it to instructions for the prosthesis," says Roberto Muñoz Guerrero, researcher at the Department of Electrical Engineering and project leader at Cinvestav.

He explains that the electric signal won’t come from the muscles that form the stump, but from the movement patterns of the brain. “If this phase is successful, the patient would be able to move the prosthesis by imagining different movements.”

However, Muñoz Guerrero acknowledges this is not an easy task because the brain registers a wide range of activities that occur in the human body and from all of them, the movement pattern is tried to be drawn. “Therefore, the first step is to recall the patterns in the EEG and define there the memory that can be electrically recorded. Then we need to evaluate how sensitive the signal is to other external shocks, such as light or blinking.”

Regarding this, it should be noted that the prosthesis could only be used by individuals who once had their entire arm and was amputated because some accident or illness. Patients were able to move the arm naturally and stored in their memory the process that would apply for the use of the prosthesis.

According to the researcher, the prosthesis must be provided with a mechanical and electronic system, the elements necessary to activate it and a section that would interpret the brain signals. “Regarding the material with which it must be built, it has not yet been fully defined because it must weigh between two and three kilograms, which is similar to the missing arm’s weight.”

The unique prosthesis represents a new topic in bioelectronics called BCI (Brain Computer Interface), which is a direct communication pathway between the brain and an external device in order to help or repair sensory and motor functions. “An additional benefit is the ability to create motion paths for the prosthesis, which is not possible with commercial products,” says Muñoz Guerrero.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Investigación y Desarrollo. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Richard S. Marken, Ph.D.
Author of Doing Research on Purpose.

Now available from Amazon or Barnes & Noble

[From Rick Marken (2014.08.09.1000)]

image0067.jpg

image00110.png

···

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Ted Cloak tcloak@unm.edu wrote:

Thanks for that, Rick. The LA Times article, and the source article (attached) are crazy-making, because they don’t seem to realize what they’ve got. Over and over, they speak about how the subject (says he) feels different surfaces, downplaying or ignoring the fact that, feel or not, he controls that feedback to accomplish his intent!

RM: Yes, it is rather exasperating, their not recognizing that they are providing the ability to control (rather than just generate outputs). But I’m willing to cut these engineers some slack because their intuitions (about the importance of providing sensory input) are so good and, particularly, because their prosthesis is so wonderfully helpful to amputees. And, of course, it does provide a nice “existence proof” of the idea that behavior is the control of perception.

Best

Rick

From: csgnet-request@lists.illinois.edu [mailto:csgnet-request@lists.illinois.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Marken
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 1:34 PM
To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Cc: Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)
Subject: Re: New prosthetic arm controlled by neural messages

[From Rick Marken (2014.08.08.1230)]

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Ted Cloak tcloak@unm.edu wrote:

Could this even be done without (implicitly) employing PCT?

Ted

Sure they can do it; they are doing it. But it won’t work very well because it is based on the assumption that the brain controls output. In fact, the brain controls input (by varying output). So, since the person using the prosthesis doesn’t perceive (at least proprioceptively or kinesthetically) the results of whatever output signals the brain send to the prosthesis, the behavior produced by the prosthesis will not be very well organized.

A prosthesis that is built around an understanding of control of perception has already been created. The reference is at

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-sensorized-prosthetic-hand-20140204-story.html#axzz2sTjlxwzu

We already discussed on the net, I think. But the results are dramatically great and pretty much what would be expected based on PCT: When you give a person the ability to perceive the consequences of their actions that they want to control then they can control those consequences quite well, even when the actions are produced by a prosthetic device rather than their own muscles.

Best

Rick

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


New prosthetic arm controlled by neural messages

Date:

August 6, 2014

Source:

Investigación y Desarrollo


Prosthetic. This design aims to identify the memory of movement in the amputee’s brain in order to manipulate the device.

[Click to enlarge image]

A new design aims to identify the memory of movement in the amputee’s brain in order to manipulate the prosthetic device.

Controlling a prosthetic arm by just imagining a motion may be possible through the work of Mexican scientists at the Centre for Research and Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV), who work in the development of an arm replacement to identify movement patterns from brain signals.

First, it is necessary to know if there is a memory pattern to remember in the amputee’s brain in order to know how it moved and, thus, translating it to instructions for the prosthesis," says Roberto Muñoz Guerrero, researcher at the Department of Electrical Engineering and project leader at Cinvestav.

He explains that the electric signal won’t come from the muscles that form the stump, but from the movement patterns of the brain. “If this phase is successful, the patient would be able to move the prosthesis by imagining different movements.”

However, Muñoz Guerrero acknowledges this is not an easy task because the brain registers a wide range of activities that occur in the human body and from all of them, the movement pattern is tried to be drawn. “Therefore, the first step is to recall the patterns in the EEG and define there the memory that can be electrically recorded. Then we need to evaluate how sensitive the signal is to other external shocks, such as light or blinking.”

Regarding this, it should be noted that the prosthesis could only be used by individuals who once had their entire arm and was amputated because some accident or illness. Patients were able to move the arm naturally and stored in their memory the process that would apply for the use of the prosthesis.

According to the researcher, the prosthesis must be provided with a mechanical and electronic system, the elements necessary to activate it and a section that would interpret the brain signals. “Regarding the material with which it must be built, it has not yet been fully defined because it must weigh between two and three kilograms, which is similar to the missing arm’s weight.”

The unique prosthesis represents a new topic in bioelectronics called BCI (Brain Computer Interface), which is a direct communication pathway between the brain and an external device in order to help or repair sensory and motor functions. “An additional benefit is the ability to create motion paths for the prosthesis, which is not possible with commercial products,” says Muñoz Guerrero.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Investigación y Desarrollo. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Richard S. Marken, Ph.D.
Author of Doing Research on Purpose.

Now available from Amazon or Barnes & Noble


Richard S. Marken, Ph.D.

Author of Doing Research on Purpose.
Now available from Amazon or Barnes & Noble