P.S. None of that perceptual intelligence “stuff” is to my liking. It deals with the notion that all we know of the world out there is by way of our perceptions, and that’s okay, but then it goes on to lay out how we process those perceptions and it gets a little freaky at that point.
Fred
···
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 6:43 AM To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: Perceptual Intelligence
Well, I guess I won’t be exploiting the term “perceptual intelligence” after all. I Googled it and turns out there’s a ton of stuff already out there.
Yes, usually they do not take into account that our perceptions or senses are just tools which have developed by evolutionary reorganization to help our self-preservation
i.e. control of intrinsic values.
Perceptions, senses and knowledge are considered as somewhat disconnected from our living and action – and, ok, behavior.
They think we just process our perceptions like computers.
···
Eetu
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: 8. kesäkuuta 2017 14:09 To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: RE: Perceptual Intelligence
[From Fred Nickols (2017.06.08.0706)]
P.S. None of that perceptual intelligence “stuff” is to my liking. It deals with the notion that all we know of the world out there is by way of our perceptions, and that’s okay, but then it goes on to lay out how we
process those perceptions and it gets a little freaky at that point.
Fred
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 6:43 AM To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: Perceptual Intelligence
Well, I guess I won’t be exploiting the term “perceptual intelligence” after all. I Googled it and turns out there’s a ton of stuff already out there.
Well, dang. I still think we can us it as PI vs AI. There are often different definitions for the same word. I see it as the operating software that will run perceptual robots.
Yes, usually they do not take into account that our perceptions or senses are just tools which have developed by evolutionary reorganization to help our self-preservation
i.e. control of intrinsic values.
Perceptions, senses and knowledge are considered as somewhat disconnected from our living and action and, ok, behavior.
They think we just process our perceptions like computers.
Â
Eetu
Â
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: 8. kesäkuuta 2017 14:09 To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: RE: Perceptual Intelligence
Â
[From Fred Nickols (2017.06.08.0706)]
Â
P.S. None of that perceptual intelligence âstuffâ? is to my liking. It deals with the notion that all we know of the world out there is by way of our perceptions, and thatâs okay, but then it goes on to lay out how we
process those perceptions and it gets a little freaky at that point.
Â
Fred
Â
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 6:43 AM To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: Perceptual Intelligence
Â
Well, I guess I wonât be exploiting the term âperceptual intelligenceâ? after all. I Googled it and turns out thereâs a ton of stuff already out there.
Well, dang. I still think we can us it as PI vs AI. There are often different definitions for the same word. I see it as the operating software that will run perceptual robots.
Yes, usually they do not take into account that our perceptions or senses are just tools which have developed by evolutionary reorganization
to help our self-preservation i.e. control of intrinsic values.
Perceptions, senses and knowledge are considered as somewhat disconnected from our living and action – and, ok, behavior.
They think we just process our perceptions like computers.
Â
Eetu
Â
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: 8. kesäkuuta 2017 14:09 To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: RE: Perceptual Intelligence
Â
[From Fred Nickols (2017.06.08.0706)]
Â
P.S. None of that perceptual intelligence “stuff� is to my liking. It deals with the notion that all we know of the world out there is by way of our perceptions,
and that’s okay, but then it goes on to lay out how we process those perceptions and it gets a little freaky at that point.
Â
Fred
Â
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 6:43 AM To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: Perceptual Intelligence
Â
Well, I guess I won’t be exploiting the term “perceptual intelligence� after all. I Googled it and turns out there’s a ton of stuff already out there.
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 1:09 PM To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: RE: Perceptual Intelligence
[From Fred Nickols (2017.06.08.0706)]
FN : P.S. None of that perceptual intelligence “stuff” is to my liking. It deals with the notion that all we know of the world out there is by way of our perceptions, and that’s okay, but then it goes on to lay out how we process those perceptions and it gets a little freaky at that point.
HB : Well said Fred. But Bill already solved the problem.
Bill P. :
Briefly, then: what I call the hierarchy of perceptions is the model. When you open your eyes and look around, what you see – and feel, smell, hear, and taste – is the model. In fact we never experience anything but the model. The model is composed of perceptions of all kinds from intensities on up.
HB : So “complex perceptions” are organized in some kind of “subjective model” in any LCS through hierarchy. How model is constructed you can read in B:CP.
I have a suggestion Fred. Whenever you have a question about PCT I think, that you could maybe look first into Bills’ literature or “Google” through CSGnet archives. Maybe you get “first hand” answer.
Boris
Fred
From: Fred Nickols [mailto:fred@nickols.us] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 6:43 AM To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu Subject: Perceptual Intelligence
Well, I guess I won’t be exploiting the term “perceptual intelligence” after all. I Googled it and turns out there’s a ton of stuff already out there.