Problems posting

CSGnet Archive CSG2017
1

When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]

No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?

I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:

···

----
[Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]

[From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the
----

Did anyone else receive it?

--
Richard Kennaway
School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK

2

I did receive that post and am not receiving the spoofing warning.

Bruce

···

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 14, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) <R.Kennaway@uea.ac.uk> wrote:

When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing\]

No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?

I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:

----
[Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]

[From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the
----

Did anyone else receive it?

--
Richard Kennaway
School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK

3

I’ve received both of your messages (and this third). Neither was
headed as below.

  Also when I send a message to csgnet I don't get a copy or

confirmation message back. Are you subscribed with two different
email addresses?

···

Regards,
Rupert

  On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) wrote:


When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at ]
No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
----
[Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
[From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the ----
Did anyone else receive it?
--
Richard Kennaway
School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK

http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing

4

Richard,

  When I had similar problems (actually being blocked rather than

being warned), the answer was for Rick to get the guru to
whitelist my mailing address. Your symptom is different, but it
might have the same solution.

Martin

···

On 2017/11/14 11:12 AM, Rupert Young
wrote:

    I've received both of your messages (and this third). Neither

was headed as below.

    Also when I send a message to csgnet I don't get a copy or

confirmation message back. Are you subscribed with two different
email addresses?

Regards,
Rupert

    On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) wrote:


When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at ]
No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
----
[Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
[From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the ----
Did anyone else receive it?
--
Richard Kennaway
School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK

http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing

5

I may be facing the same problem of possibly having some messages blocked. On Friday (2017.11.11 9:25 pm EST) I sent a message to csgnet titled “Popularizing PCT on Facebook”. Was it received by any of you (or others on the csgnet)??? Please let me know if you received it or not.

Richard Pfau

···

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Martin Taylor mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net wrote:

Richard,

  When I had similar problems (actually being blocked rather than

being warned), the answer was for Rick to get the guru to
whitelist my mailing address. Your symptom is different, but it
might have the same solution.

Martin

  On 2017/11/14 11:12 AM, Rupert Young

wrote:

    I've received both of your messages (and this third). Neither

was headed as below.

    Also when I send a message to csgnet I don't get a copy or

confirmation message back. Are you subscribed with two different
email addresses?

Regards,
Rupert

    On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) wrote:


When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__aka.ms_LearnAboutSpoofing&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=AeB2gF2KraqXCvqlID1T-SccXWy4PgMLLMHmGZV4Gjo&s=wwaL_3zoowDkaV5y_OFDaGfd5TyeEgAkmn9fBkGrXDk&e=)
]
No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
----
[Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
[From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the ----
Did anyone else receive it?
--
Richard Kennaway
School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
6

Received normally.

Martin

···

On 2017/11/14 3:30 PM, Richard Pfau
wrote:

      I may be facing the same problem of possibly having some

messages blocked. On Friday (2017.11.11 9:25 pm EST) I sent
a message to csgnet titled "** Popularizing PCT on
Facebook** ". Was it received by any of you (or
others on the csgnet)??? Please let me know if you received
it or not.

Richard Pfau

      On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM,

Martin Taylor mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net
wrote:

Richard,

            When I had similar problems (actually being blocked

rather than being warned), the answer was for Rick to
get the guru to whitelist my mailing address. Your
symptom is different, but it might have the same
solution.

Martin

                On

2017/11/14 11:12 AM, Rupert Young wrote:

                  I've received both of your messages (and this

third). Neither was headed as below.

                  Also when I send a message to csgnet I don't get

a copy or confirmation message back. Are you
subscribed with two different email addresses?

Regards,
Rupert

                  On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP -

Visitor) wrote:


When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:
[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__aka.ms_LearnAboutSpoofing&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=AeB2gF2KraqXCvqlID1T-SccXWy4PgMLLMHmGZV4Gjo&s=wwaL_3zoowDkaV5y_OFDaGfd5TyeEgAkmn9fBkGrXDk&e=)
]
No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?
I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back. The first one began:
----
[Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]
[From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]
RM: The equation above implies that log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the ----
Did anyone else receive it?
--
Richard Kennaway
School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
7

[From Fred Nickols (2017.11.14.1607 ET)]

For what it’s worth I received it – and, obviously, this one. However, I received the popularizing email on Saturday, not Friday.

Fred Nickols

···

From: Richard Pfau [mailto:richardhpfau@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 3:31 PM
To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Subject: Re: Problems posting

I may be facing the same problem of possibly having some messages blocked. On Friday (2017.11.11 9:25 pm EST) I sent a message to csgnet titled “Popularizing PCT on Facebook”. Was it received by any of you (or others on the csgnet)??? Please let me know if you received it or not.

Richard Pfau

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Martin Taylor mmt-csg@mmtaylor.net wrote:

Richard,

When I had similar problems (actually being blocked rather than being warned), the answer was for Rick to get the guru to whitelist my mailing address. Your symptom is different, but it might have the same solution.

Martin

On 2017/11/14 11:12 AM, Rupert Young wrote:

I’ve received both of your messages (and this third). Neither was headed as below.

Also when I send a message to csgnet I don’t get a copy or confirmation message back. Are you subscribed with two different email addresses?

Regards,
Rupert

On 14/11/2017 15:45, Richard Kennaway (CMP - Visitor) wrote:

When I post to CSGNET, the copy I receive back from the list is always headed:

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at [http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__aka.ms_LearnAboutSpoofing&d=DwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=-dJBNItYEMOLt6aj_KjGi2LMO_Q8QB-ZzxIZIF8DGyQ&m=AeB2gF2KraqXCvqlID1T-SccXWy4PgMLLMHmGZV4Gjo&s=wwaL_3zoowDkaV5y_OFDaGfd5TyeEgAkmn9fBkGrXDk&e=)]

No-one else's messages are so headed. Are other people seeing this, or is it a problem at my end?

I've sent two messages today, but I've only received the second one back.  The first one began:

----

[Richard Kennaway (2017.10.14 1309 GMT)]

[From Rick Marken (2017.11.13.2250)]

RM: The equation above implies that  log (V) = 1/3 log(D) + 1/3 log (R). So if only log (R) is used in the analysis, the coefficient found by the

----

Did anyone else receive it?

--

Richard Kennaway

School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK