From ssaunde@olc.edu Sat Oct 27 08:47:44 2001
Received: from ssaunde by igor with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 15xUkQ-0003tm-00; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 08:47:44 -0600
Received: from mail.olc.edu
by fetchmail-4.6.4 IMAP
for <ssaunde/localhost> (single-drop); Sat, 27 Oct 2001 08:47:42 MDT
Received: from weird-jeep.neonova.net (mail.gwtc.net [137.118.129.3]) by mail.olc.edu with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id VRMA8GCR; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 08:18:35 -0600
Received: from [64.251.161.39] (HELO igor)
by weird-jeep.neonova.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8)
with ESMTP id 38106099 for ssaunders@olc.edu; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 10:25:40 -0400
Received: from mail by igor with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 15xHWY-0003VB-00; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:40:30 -0600
X-Failed-Recipients: csgnet@postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu
···
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@olc.edu>
To: ssaunders@olc.edu
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <E15xHWY-0003VB-00@igor>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:40:30 -0600
Sender: Samuel Spence Saunders <ssaunde@olc.edu>
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2125
Lines: 48
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:
csgnet@postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu:
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:
<csgnet@postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu>:
host mail.gwtc.net [137.118.129.3]:
571 csgnet@postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu we do not relay
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <ssaunders@olc.edu>
Received: from ssaunde by igor with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 15xHLq-0003UP-00; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:29:26 -0600
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:29:26 -0600
From: Samuel Spence Saunders <ssaunders@olc.edu>
To: Control Systems Group <csgnet@postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Psychology of religion
Message-ID: <20011026182926.B13369@olc.edu>
Reply-To: ssaunders@olc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: ssaunders@olc.edu
{From Samuel Spence Saunders (26 October 2001:17:55 MDT)}
I usually try to avoid topics like this. I thought I should mention, as a
possible model, a suggestion made by one of my undergraduate students in a
class discussion last week. She noted that something which we might label a
spiritual urge or need appears to be essentially universal in humans. This
might indicate an intrinsic variable. She suggested that religions might
then arrise from action of the (re)organizing system acting (in a particular
cultural context) to build control systems to bring this "sprititaul need"
to its genetically programmed reference. Changes in religion might be
expected when these control systems are no longer successful in controlling
the relevant error.
Samuel
--
Samuel Spence Saunders, Ph.D. | If man chooses oblivion, he can go right
saunders@gwtc.net | on leaving his fate to political leaders.
ssaunders@olc.edu | If he chooses Utopia, he must initiate an
> enormous educational campaign-immediately
> R. Buckminster Fuller