So, why do we let this go by, again and again. Shouldn’t the Control Systems Group reply, as a group, with a thoroughgoing critique, pointing out that PCT has
been around for a long time, specializes in closed loops and feedback, and demands respect?
Ted
···
From: Henry Yin, Ph.D. [mailto:hy43@duke.edu]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 3:11 PM
To: Dag Forssell
Cc: Ted Cloak
Subject: Re: Well, How About That?
And a closer look at the articles tells me that they are garbage as usual.
On Oct 11, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Henry Yin hy43@duke.edu wrote:
To my knowledge there is no closed loop neuroscience.
I think the work mentioned does not sound promising at all. What’s closed loop? That’s never mentioned. What’s feedback? It’s not clear if the authors know what they are talking about.
I really think people on CSG should stop forward articles just because words like “closed loop” and “negative feedback” are used. For most of his life, Bill was trying to explain how people misunderstand these words and what they really
mean.
H
On Oct 11, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Dag Forssell dag@livingcontrolsystems.com wrote:
Henry,
This just in to CSGnet.
Dag
From: Ted Cloak tcloak@unm.edu
To: “csgnet@lists.illinois.edu” csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Subject: Well, How About That?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 16:12:32 +0000
Reply-To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
from Human ethology listserv:
10
[ Closed-loop neuroscience
and neuroengineering OPEN ACCESS ](Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos)
Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:44 am (PDT) . Posted by:
“Jay Feierman” jrfeier
Closed-loop neuroscience and neuroengineering
< http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2014.00115/full?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Neuroscience-w41-2014
Steve
M Potter, Ahmed El Hady, and Eberhard E Fetz
