RM: A deep knowledge of classical control theory is not necessary in order to understand PCT.
Oh, I’m not saying you don’t have a deep knowledge of classical control theory. I’m saying you don’t have the BASIC knowledge of classical control theory, and the math that is needed to understand the behavioral illusion. If it makes you happy, it looks like that neither Martin Taylor had it.
Not fake news, here is Bill correcting you two bozos on how to derive the equations of the behavioral illusion in 2010! [Beyond the Fringe (was An Opportunity for PCT PR) - #26 by Bill_Powers1]
That is just a small example. In the previous topic on the behavioral illusion, where I followed the 1978 paper derivation, you made the same kinds of mistakes, just like in this topic.