Rick what is too much is too much. You are seriously damaging PCT.
You don’t understand it and beside that you are making your own constructs which has no connection to PCT.
···
From: Richard Marken (rsmarken@gmail.com via csgnet Mailing List) csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 6:56 AM
To: csgnet@lists.illinois.edu
Cc: Richard Marken rsmarken@gmail.com
Subject: The controlled quantity (q.i) is data, the perceptual signal (p) is theory
[Rick Marken 2018-05-28_21:46:30]
RM: In my reply to Rupert today I said:
RM… there seems to be general agreement that I am completely wrong to think that q.i is the controlled perception, p, from the observer’s perspective.
HB : Right. You are wrong. We proved to you with Bills’ diagrams (generic and “Rubber band”). In both cases “q.i.” is just “input qauntity” which consist of added effects of “q.o”. and “d” and enters “sensor function”. Do you agree with Bills’ diagrams or not ? Because it is obviously that you don’t agree with Bill as you are making your own theory RCT.
RM : I think this is the only way to see things if one is involved in doing research on PCT.
HB : First of all you are not doing any PCT research, You are constructing “tests” and “demos” which suit your imagination. With “tests” and “demos” you confirm what you want to confirm. It has nothing to do with scientific research. You are living in your RCT world Rick. You are no scientific researcher. You are just a dreamer.
RM : Since most everyone on CSGNet is not involved in doing PCT research I suppose the only problem with not seeing that q.i as p from the observer’s perspective is that you’ll keep getting into useless verbal arguments about it with me.
HB : We are involved in PCT research but you are not. From any point of observing “q.i.” is “input quantity” to any LCS which is transformed into perceptual signal.
RM: Upon reflection I realized that failure to understand that the controlled quantity, q.i, is the controlled perception, p,
HB : There is no “controlled perception” in PCT. I have to ask you once again. Do you agree with Bills’ PCT ???
"Input quantity is q.i., controlled quantity is ….
<
Bill P (B:CP) : Consider once again the meaning of the term controlled quantity. A controlled quantity is controlled only because it is detected by a control system, compared with a reference, and affected by outputs based on the error thus detected. The controlled quantity is defined strictly by the behaving system’s perceptual computers; it may or may not be identifiable as an objective (need I put in quotes?) property of, or entity in, the physical environment. In general an observer will not, therefore, be able to see what a control system is controlling
HB : The controlled quantity is defined strictly by the behaving system’s perceptual computers; Â Do you understand this language ? Bill wrote it. Your teacher. “Q.I.” is not defined “strictly by perceptual computers”. Perception is. “Q.I.” is outside organism (see diagram). Can somebody read to Rick so that he will understand what is written ?
HB : Are you blind Rick ? You wear thick spectacles ? “Q.I.” is not and can’t be “controlled quantity” in PCT. I’ll ask you again. Do you agree with Bills definition of “Controlled quantiy”. We aew talking about PCT. Why don’t you use Bills’ tools for promoting PCT. You are promoting RCT (Ricks’ Control Theory).
It’s just input to “input function” which produces “perceptual signal” the “controlled quantity”. We read “q.i. diagram” and in your head there is no perceptual signal with any trace of “q.i. diagram”. Nothing. Empty ???
RM : …from the observer’s perspecttive is not just a problem for researchers. If you don’t understand this, then you don’t understand what is fundamental about PCT:
HB : You don’t understand anything anyway when you are in RCT mode.
RM : ……that it is a theory that explains the fact of control as it is seen in the behavior of living systems.
HB : PCT (Perceptual Control Theory) is general theory about how organisms function. You have to research such a phenomenon from tha aspect of many sciences and not from chair in your home behind computer and playing with joystick.
Bill P (B:CP):
CONTROL : Achievement and maintenance of a preselected state in the controlling system, through actions on the environment that also cancel the effects of disturbances.
And just in case I’ll add also definition of PCT control from Tim Carey :
TC (2014) :
According to PCT, control is a process of acting to bring a perceived aspect of the world into a match with a mental specification for the state of that perception
But RCT (Ricks’ Control Theory) explains control as it is seen in the behavior of living systems.
RCT (Ricks Control Theory) definition of control loop
CONTROL : Keeping of some »aspect of outer environment« in reference state, protected (defended) from disturbances.
HB : Do you understand the difference ???
RM: The controlled quantity is a variable that we see being kept in a reference state, often symbolized q.i*.
HB : With what are you keeping “controlled quantity” or q.i. in reference state ??? With “Control of behavior” ??? Or you use Telekinesis ? How do you see that when person is sleeping or observing rock ?
Again, why don’t you use Bill’s definition. Why inventing your own wrong ?
Bill P (B:CP) : Consider once again the meaning of the term controlled quantity. A controlled quantity is controlled only because it is detected by a control system, compared with a reference, and affected by outputs based on the error thus detected. The controlled quantity is defined strictly by the behaving system’s perceptual computers; it may or may not be identifiable as an objective (need I put in quotes?) property of, or entity in, the physical environment. In general an observer will not, therefore, be able to see what a control system is controlling
RM : Thus, variations (or lack thereof) in the controlled quantity, q.i, and the fact that q.i is being kept in a reference state, q.i*, protected from disturbance,
HB : Ha,ha,ha… q.ii. is “protected from disturbances”. Then nothing influence organism. It’s protected against disturbances. What if somebody is shooting on you ? You are probably not afraid as you are “protected from disturbances”. That’s what control is for you. Protection from dosturbances.
RM : ….are the data on which we base our conclusion that the behavior we see involves control.
HB : Because there is no such thing as “Behavior imvolve control” in PCT we would need some evidences that we could see how “behavior involve control”.Maybe you could offer some physiological evidences like Bill did that “Behavior is not control” and that it doesn’t involve any control ???
You are against Bills’ PCT. You are damage maker. Show us where you thnik Bill was wrong if you think that you have to make your own theory.
RM : As Powers says on p. 175 of LCS “In these reference states we have the heart of the problem to which control theory is addressed”.
HB : So what ? How is this connected to “behavior involve control” ? The heart of the problem to which PCT “contol theory” adress is the problem of keeping “intrinsic variables” in reference states. And behavior is just support. That’s how organism survive.
RM: So PCT (which was then just called control theory because that’s what it is) is the theory that accounts for the observed fact that organisms keep certain variables, q.i, in reference states, q.i*.
HB : Where do you this in PCT ?
Bill P (B:CP):
CONTROL : Achievement and maintenance of a preselected state in the controlling system, through actions on the environment that also cancel the effects of disturbances.
And just in case also definition of PCT control from Tim Carey :
TC (2014) :
According to PCT, control is a process of acting to bring a perceived aspect of the world into a match with a mental specification for the state of that perception
And certain Marken wrote this (2001) :
For example, catching the fly ball seems to involve moving so as to keep a perception of the optical projection of the ball fairly stationary.
HB : This was probably PCT Marken (not RCT) as that is far away in the past (2001) when certain Marken understood PCT.
In these days ceratin Marken is daily changing his oppinion. It’s the fastest changing I ever saw…
RM : …q.i. is contrrolled by S and, thus, corresponds to the perception S is controlling.
HB : Once “q.i.” is contolled by S and few hours before “q.i.” was controlled by “E”.
RM : ….the difference between q.i and p is that q.i is an observation in E (or a surrogate of E) while p is a theoretical neural signal in S.
HB : But if in both seems to be neural currents just “theoretical” so I’m asking myself whether they are alive or not ?
You are confussion maker Rick.
RM : The theory accounts for this fact by assuming that the organism controls a perceptual signal, p, that is an exact analog of q.i.
HB : Go read again Bills’ literature. Even if it would be exact analog, it is not controlled and kept in reference state. Perceptual signal is kept in reference state. You wrote it for yourself :
RM (2001) : For example, catching the fly ball seems to involve moving so as to keep a perception of the optical projection of the ball fairly stationary
HB : Obviously in the time when you understood PCT you use similar terms for outside events as Bill and Kent : stability.
RM: It’s the fact of control (the fact that q.i is observed to be maintained in a reference state, q.i*, protected from normal disturbances)
HB : This is RCT (Rikcs’ Control Thoery) which affirms that “controlled variable” (q.i.) in environment is kept in reference state. So it is “controlled”. This is the state today. It is not PCT Rick.
RCT (Ricks Control Theory) definition of control loop
CONTROL : Keeping of some »aspect of outer environment« in reference state, protected (defended) from disturbances.
OUTPUT FUNCTION : controlled effects (control of behavior) to outer environment so to keep some »controlled variable« in reference state
HB : And how many times do we have to tell you that nothing is “protected from disturbances”. To Humans is usually enough to repeat things once or twice. But repeating somebody the sam thing 30 x someone must ask himself whether he is repeating it to human being. Are you maybe Alien Rick from another Planet ?
Disturbances mostly affect organism and perception so that organism can counteract. If organism is protected from disturbances how can counteract disturbances. How can you influence people if they are protected from disturbances ?
RM : ….that motivates the theory that says that thiis observation is a result of control of perception. The controlled variable, q.i, is data.
HB : Data to whom ? It sems that there is only one person that can see data from real reality. All mighty Rick (superman).
RM : PCT says that this data can be accounted for by a theory that says that a perceptual signal that is an exact analog of of the controlled variable is being controlled.
HB : Where PCT says that ?
RM : The perceptual signal, p, is theory.
HB : So in your nervous system there is no real neural signals.just theoretical So we could say that you are theoretical construction. I assumed that you must be from another Planet. My assumption seems to be right.
HB : And how will you explain what is happening in nervous system which can be observed by physiologist, biologist etc. ? What is fluctuating in your nervous system… Theoretical impulses which are part of theoretical organism. Rick look yourself in mirror. Do you really exist or you are just theorethical construct ???
RM: So the controlled variable, q.i,
HB : “Q.i.” is not controlled variable. “P” is. Perceptual signal is controlled in comparator not “q.i.”. See the diagram.
RM : ….is unquestionably the observer’s perspective on what the controller is presumed to be perceiving (in theory).
HB : “Q.I.” is necesary part of any control loop of any LCS. Even Bacteria. See Bills diagram and stop living in your imagination. Open your eyes to see what is really happening in reality.
RM : The idea that this is not the case is a misunderstanding of PCT…
HB : Rick stop confussing and misleading people. Look what you’ve done to Warren. Does he really deserve to share your halucinations ? Stop being RCT Rick. Start being PCT Rick. At least for Warrens credibility if you don’t care for yourself. And there are Powers ladies. Do you think on anybody else but yourself.
The idea that you think that “q.i.” is just experimenters (E) perceptual signal is wrong and shows misunderstading of PCT. You are the one that don’t understand PCT. You are thinking in RCT.
RM : ….so profound as to make even a detailed knowledge of the theory perfectly useless for understanding the behavior of living organisms.
HB : Right. RCT (Ricks’ Control Theory) is perfectly useless for understanding the behavior of living organisms…and for understanding how organisms function.
PCT is theory about how orgsnisms function and the function of “behavior” is just supportive :
Bill P. at all (50th Anniversary, 2011) :
Perceptual Control Theory (PCT) provides a general theory of functioning for organisms. At the conceptual core of the theory is the observation that living things control the perceived environment by means of their behavior. Consequently, the phenomenon of control takes center stage in PCT, with observable behavior playing an important but supporting role.
Boris
Best
Rick
–
Richard S. Marken
"Perfection is achieved not when you have nothing more to add, but when you
have nothing left to take away.�
–Antoine de Saint-Exupery